The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human
Abstract
In ‘How Forests Think’, Eduardo Kohn sets the agenda for an ambitious plan; to develop, an anthropology that could attend not only to the ways in which non-humans act or react, but also to the ways...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Scale: Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life
(2016) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/luminos.15 · Cited by 621
Keane, W. (2018) · Signs and Society · doi:10.1086/695387 · Cited by 298
van Dooren, T., & Rose, D. B. (2016) · Environmental Humanities · doi:10.1215/22011919-3527731 · Cited by 286
Enactive Ethics: Difference Becoming Participation
Di Paolo, E. A., & De Jaegher, H. (2022) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-021-09766-x · Cited by 99
Conceptualizing agency: Folkpsychological and folkcommunicative perspectives on plants
ojalehto, B. L., Medin, D. L., & García, S. G. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.023 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Di Giminiani, P.
- Venue
- Ethnos
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-02-19
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 179-182
- ISSN
- 0014-1844 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-588X
- OpenAlex
- W2006178391
- Cited by
- 945
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 531.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00141844.2013.867890
- The paper
- Di Giminiani, P. (2016). How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Ethnos. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2013.867890
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
