The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lively Ethography
Open accessAbstract
This article is an effort to dwell with the kinds of writing and thinking practices that we have been developing in our research, especially over the past seven years. This is an approach grounded in an attentiveness to the evolving ways of life (or ēthea; singular: ethos) of diverse forms of human and nonhuman life and in an effort to explore and perhaps restory the relationships that constitute and nourish them. Our aim is to develop “lively ethographies”: a mode of knowing, engaging, and storytelling that recognizes the meaningful lives of others and that, in so doing, enlivens our capacity to respond to them by singing up their character or ethos. Most of our work in this area has focused on extinction, but this approach might readily be taken up in a range of other contexts. This article alternates between two types of writing. One is expository and lays out an analysis of ethos, liveliness, storytelling, “response-ability,” and becoming witness. The second is performative, offering short ethographic vignettes that enact some of the qualities and approaches we have discussed. Here each of these vignettes is taken from our recent work in Hawai‘i, a deeply generative and often fraught field site that has inspired much of our thinking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Interpretation of Cultures
Fenn, R., & Geertz, C. (1974) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1384392 · Cited by 19,154
The Interpretation of Cultures
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912128310 · Cited by 16,449
Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning
Barad, K. (2006) · doi:10.2307/j.ctv12101zq · Cited by 10,472
(2007) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 7,214
Thick Description: Towards an Interpretive Theory of Culture
Geertz, C. (1973) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · doi:10.4324/9780203931950-11 · Cited by 4,173
Hinchliffe, S. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,439
THE EMERGENCE OF MULTISPECIES ETHNOGRAPHY
KIRKSEY, S. E., & HELMREICH, S. (2010) · Cultural Anthropology · doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x · Cited by 2,247
(2001) · Cited by 1,278
Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason
Benton, T. (2003) · Radical philosophy · Cited by 1,040
How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human
Di Giminiani, P. (2016) · Ethnos · doi:10.1080/00141844.2013.867890 · Cited by 945
Cited by
Multispecies justice: theories, challenges, and a research agenda for environmental politics
Celermajer, D., Schlosberg, D., Rickards, L., Stewart-Harawira, M., Thaler, M., Tschakert, P., Verlie, B., & Winter, C. (2021) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2020.1827608 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- van Dooren, T., & Rose, D. B.
- Venue
- Environmental Humanities
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2016-05-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-94
- ISSN
- 2201-1919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2471716418
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 88.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lively Ethography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1215/22011919-3527731
- The paper
- van Dooren, T., & Rose, D. B. (2016). Lively Ethography. Environmental Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3527731
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.