Cited by 204Stock Market Forecasting MethodsFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesFinancial Analysis and Corporate Governance

Machine Learning for Stock Selection

Rasekhschaffe, Keywan Christian, Jones, Robert C.·2019·Financial Analysts Journal

Abstract

Machine learning is an increasingly important and controversial topic in quantitative finance. A lively debate persists as to whether machine learning techniques can be practical investment tools. Although machine learning algorithms can uncover subtle, contextual, and nonlinear relationships, overfitting poses a major challenge when one is trying to extract signals from noisy historical data. We describe some of the basic concepts of machine learning and provide a simple example of how investors can use machine learning techniques to forecast the cross-section of stock returns while limiting the risk of overfitting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0015198x.2019.1596678

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rasekhschaffe, K. C., & Jones, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Keywan Christian Rasekhschaffe is a senior quantitative strategist at Gresham Investment Management, LLC, in New York City.
  • Robert C. Jones, CFA, is chair and chief investment officer of System Two Advisors, LP, in Summit, New Jersey.
Venue
Financial Analysts Journal
Published
2019-05-13
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
70-88
ISSN
  • 0015-198X (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3312
OpenAlex
W2923002376
Cited by
204
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
14.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Financial Analysts Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
Keywords
machine learning, stock selection, financial mathematics, overfitting, cross-section of stock returns, return forecasting, nonlinear relationship, investment tools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review