Cited by 27earthquake and tectonic studiesEarthquake and Disaster Impact StudiesBiblical Studies and Interpretation

Amos’s earthquake: An extraordinary Middle East seismic event of 750 B.C

Austin, Steven A., Franz, Gordon W., Frost, Eric G.·2000·International Geology Review

Abstract

Widely separated archaeological excavations in Israel and Jordan contain late Iron Age (Iron IIb) architecture bearing evidence of a great earthquake. Masonry walls best display the earthquake, especially walls with broken ashlars, walls with displaced rows of stones, walls still standing but leaning or bowed, and walls collapsed with large sections still lying course-on-course. Debris at six sites (Hazor, Deir ‘Alia, Gezer, Lachish, Tell Judeideh, and ‘En Haseva) is tightly confined stratigraphically to the middle of the eighth century B.C., with dating errors of ∼30 years. Biblical and post-biblical sources indicate a single, regionally extensive earthquake in the year 750 B.C. The epicenter was north of present-day Israel, probably in Lebanon, as indicated by the southward decrease in degree of damage at sites in Israel and Jordan. A large area of the ancient kingdoms of Israel and Judah was shaken at Modified Mercalli Intensity 9 or higher. The distance from the epicenter (north of Israel) to isoseismal VIII (south of Israel) was at least 175 km, but could have been as much as 300 km. The earthquake was at least magnitude 7.8, but likely was 8.2, the magnitude being estimated by scaling of isoseismal radii relative to smaller historic earthquakes in Israel and Lebanon. The M1 ≍ 8.2 event of 750 B.C. appears to be the largest yet documented on the Dead Sea transform fault during the last four millennia. This severe geologic disaster has been linked historically to a speech delivered at the city of Bethel by a shepherd-farmer named Amos of Tekoa. Amos's earthquake was synchronous with the introduction of “seismic theophany” imagery into Hebrew literature, with the appearance of the “Day of the Lord” eschatological motif, and with the explosive emergence of “writing prophets” in Israel.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00206810009465104

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A mid-8th century BC earthquake occurred more than 150 y prior to the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem.

    “The second crucial chronological peg involves a mid-8th century BC earthquake, occurring more than 150 y prior to the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem (corresponding to Shiloh’s Stratum 12b, SI Appendix, Table S1).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Austin, S. A., Franz, G. W., & Frost, E. G.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Creation Research (US)
  • b 41 Garwood Road, Fair Lawn, New Jersey, 07410
  • San Diego State University (US)
Venue
International Geology Review
Published
2000-07
Volume
42
Issue
7
Pages
657-671
ISSN
  • 0020-6814 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2839
OpenAlex
W2022150681
Cited by
27
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Geology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Keywords
Dead Sea transform fault, ashlars, epicenter location, seismic intensity, earthquake magnitude, Day of the Lord, Hazor, Gezer, Lachish

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review