Amos’s earthquake: An extraordinary Middle East seismic event of 750 B.C
Abstract
Widely separated archaeological excavations in Israel and Jordan contain late Iron Age (Iron IIb) architecture bearing evidence of a great earthquake. Masonry walls best display the earthquake, especially walls with broken ashlars, walls with displaced rows of stones, walls still standing but leaning or bowed, and walls collapsed with large sections still lying course-on-course. Debris at six sites (Hazor, Deir ‘Alia, Gezer, Lachish, Tell Judeideh, and ‘En Haseva) is tightly confined stratigraphically to the middle of the eighth century B.C., with dating errors of ∼30 years. Biblical and post-biblical sources indicate a single, regionally extensive earthquake in the year 750 B.C. The epicenter was north of present-day Israel, probably in Lebanon, as indicated by the southward decrease in degree of damage at sites in Israel and Jordan. A large area of the ancient kingdoms of Israel and Judah was shaken at Modified Mercalli Intensity 9 or higher. The distance from the epicenter (north of Israel) to isoseismal VIII (south of Israel) was at least 175 km, but could have been as much as 300 km. The earthquake was at least magnitude 7.8, but likely was 8.2, the magnitude being estimated by scaling of isoseismal radii relative to smaller historic earthquakes in Israel and Lebanon. The M1 ≍ 8.2 event of 750 B.C. appears to be the largest yet documented on the Dead Sea transform fault during the last four millennia. This severe geologic disaster has been linked historically to a speech delivered at the city of Bethel by a shepherd-farmer named Amos of Tekoa. Amos's earthquake was synchronous with the introduction of “seismic theophany” imagery into Hebrew literature, with the appearance of the “Day of the Lord” eschatological motif, and with the explosive emergence of “writing prophets” in Israel.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A mid-8th century BC earthquake occurred more than 150 y prior to the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem.
“The second crucial chronological peg involves a mid-8th century BC earthquake, occurring more than 150 y prior to the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem (corresponding to Shiloh’s Stratum 12b, SI Appendix, Table S1).”
From Radiocarbon chronology of Iron Age Jerusalem reveals calibration offsets and architectural developments (2024) · cites this paper as [38]
Cites
Khair, K., Tsokas, G. N., & Sawaf, T. (1997) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.1997.tb05322.x · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Regev, J., Gadot, Y., Uziel, J., Chalaf, O., Shalev, Y., Roth, H., Shalom, N., Szanton, N., Bocher, E., Pearson, C. L., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2321024121 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Austin, S. A., Franz, G. W., & Frost, E. G.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Creation Research (US)
- b 41 Garwood Road, Fair Lawn, New Jersey, 07410
- San Diego State University (US)
- Venue
- International Geology Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 657-671
- ISSN
- 0020-6814 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2839
- OpenAlex
- W2022150681
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Geology Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › earthquake and tectonic studies
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Keywords
- Dead Sea transform fault, ashlars, epicenter location, seismic intensity, earthquake magnitude, Day of the Lord, Hazor, Gezer, Lachish
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review