CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32Pain Management and Placebo EffectPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ericksonian approaches to hypnosis and therapy: Where are we now?

Matthews, William J.·2000·International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
DOI 10.1080/00207140008410370
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ericksonian approaches to psychotherapy and hypnosis have had a significant impact on many clinical practitioners over the last two decades. This article reviews the current empirical research with regard to the efficacy of these treatment approaches as well as for the key Ericksonian assumptions of: (a) belief in an altered state of consciousness and the existence of specific markers indicating an altered state; (b) the superiority of indirect suggestion over direct suggestion; and (c) client hypnotizability is a function of the hypnotist's skill. The current literature provides empirical support neither for efficacy nor for these key assumptions. The article concludes with a discussion of the need for empirically based research to test the efficacy of Ericksonian therapy and its core components, lest this approach become isolated from the scientific hypnosis and therapy communities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207140008410370

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 1994, American Psychological Association Task Force on Psychological Intervention Guidelines.
  2. Crews F. C., 1998, Uneditorized Freud: Doubters confront a legend.
  3. Crawford H. J., 1990, Creative Mastery in Hypnosis & Hypnoanalysis, 47
  4. Erickson M. H., 1980, The collected papers of Milton H. Erickson, 4
  5. Gilligan S. G., 1987, Therapeutic trances: The cooperation principle in Ericksonian hypnotherapy.
  6. 10.1037/0003-066X.51.10.1025 · DOI
  7. Matthews, W. Social influence, expectancy theory, and Ericksonian hypnosis. The Handbook ofEricksonian Therapy. Edited by: Zeig, J. and Geary, B. Redding, CT: Zeig/Tucker & Co. in press
  8. Matthews W., 1988, British Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 5, 63
  9. Nugent W. R., 1989, Ericksonian Monographs, 5, 35
  10. Otani A., 1989, Ericksonian Monographs, 5, 55
  11. Silberschatz G., 1999, Harvard Mental Health Letter, 16, 5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Matthews, W. J.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Matthews, William J.
Venue
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2000-10
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
418-426
ISSN
  • 0020-7144 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5183
DOI
10.1080/00207140008410370
OpenAlex
W2019305317
Cited by
32
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
Ericksonian therapy, hypnosis, altered states of consciousness, indirect suggestion, hypnotic susceptibility, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Humans, Hypnosis, Psychological Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review