CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 43Pain Management and Placebo EffectParanormal Experiences and BeliefsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dispositional Correlates of Hypnosis: A Phenomenological Approach

Kihlstrom, John F., Register, Patricia A., Hoyt, Irene P., Albright, Jeanne Sumi, Grigorian, Ellen M., Heindel, William C., Morrison, Charles R.·1989·International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
DOI 10.1080/00207148908414476
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

An attempt was made to construct and validate a questionnaire measure of hypnotic-like experiences based on Shor's (1979) 8-dimension phenomenological analysis of hypnosis. Separate item pools were developed to measure each disposition: Trance, Nonconscious Involvement, Archaic Involvement, Drowsiness, Relaxation, Vividness of Imagery, Absorption, and Access to the Unconscious. Based on preliminary testing (total N = 856), a final questionnaire was produced containing 5 items measuring normal, everyday experiences in each domain. Results from a standardization sample (N = 468) showed that each of the subscales, except for Archaic Involvement, possessed satisfactory levels of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Factor analysis indicated that 6 subscales loaded highly on a common factor similar to the absorption construct (Tellegen & Atkinson, 1974), while items pertaining to Relaxation and Archaic Involvement formed separate factors. Validation testing on 4 samples receiving the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A) of Shor and E. Orne (1962) (total N = 1855) showed that the Absorption and Trance dimensions correlated most strongly with HGSHS:A; the correlations with Drowsiness, Relaxation, and Nonconscious Involvement approached 0. The scales derived from Shor's analysis, however, did not improve the prediction of hypnotizability over that obtained with the absorption scale (Tellegen & Atkinson, 1974).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207148908414476

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The greater resting-state coordination of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) observed among high hypnotizables involves two key components of the anterior attentional system.

    “While the subjects in this study were not asked to engage in hypnotic tasks, the greater resting state coordination of brain areas associated with conflict detection / focusing of attention (dACC) and motor planning, integration of sensory information, regulation of intellectual function, and working memory (DLPFC) observed among high hypnotizables involve two key components of the anterior attent”

    From Functional Brain Basis of Hypnotizability (2012) · cites this paper as [58]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Barry H., 1931, Hum. Biol, 3, 1
  2. 10.1037/0021-843X.88.5.564 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.42.5.915 · DOI
  4. Goldberg L. R., 1972, Multivariate behav. Res. Monogr.
  5. Hilgard J. R., 1979, Personality and hypnosis: A study of imaginative involvement. ()
  6. Hilgard J. R., 1962, Genet. Psychol. Monogr, 66, 143
  7. 10.1037/0022-3514.53.5.948 · DOI
  8. Roche S., 1986, Absorption ability and experience: Theory and data. Unpublished B. A. (Hons.) thesis
  9. Sheehan P. W., 1979, Hypnosis: Developments in research and new perspectives. (), 381
  10. Sheehan P. W., 1982, Res. Comm. Psychol., Psychiat., Behav, 7, 257
  11. Shor R. E., 1979, Hypnosis: Developments in research and new perspectives. (), 105

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Kihlstrom, J. F., Register, P. A., Hoyt, I. P., Albright, J. S., Grigorian, E. M., Heindel, W. C., & Morrison, C. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1989-07
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
249-263
ISSN
  • 0020-7144 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5183
DOI
10.1080/00207148908414476
OpenAlex
W2092787538
Cited by
42
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (#MH-35856)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
hypnotic susceptibility, questionnaire development, absorption, trance, sleepiness, relaxation, Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, scale validation
MeSH terms
Humans, Hypnosis, Personality Inventory, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review