Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 782

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Iterative learning control and repetitive control for engineering practice

Longman, Richard W.·2000·International Journal of Control

Abstract

This paper discusses linear iterative learning and repetitive control, presenting general purpose control laws with only a few parameters to tune. The method of tuning them is straightforward, making tuning easy for the practicing control engineer. The approach can then serve the same function for learning/repetitive control, as PID controllers do in classical control. Anytime one has a controller that is to perform the same tacking command repeatedly, one simply uses such a law to adjust the command given to an existing feedback controller and achieves a substantial decrease in tracking error. Experiments with the method show that decreases by a factor between 100 and 1000 in the RMS tracking error on a commercial robot, performing a high speed trajectory can easily be obtained in 8 to 12 trials for learning. It is shown that in engineering practice, the same design criteria apply to learning control as apply to repetitive control. Although the conditions for stability are very different for the two problems, one must impose a good transient condition, and once such a condition is formulated, it is likely to be the same for both learning and repetitive control.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/002071700405905

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 782

Metadata

Authors
Longman, R. W.
Venue
International Journal of Control
Published
2000-01
Volume
73
Issue
10
Pages
930-954
ISSN
  • 0020-7179 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-5820
OpenAlex
W2017932718
Cited by
782
References
0
FWCI
14.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Iterative learning control and repetitive control for engineering practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/002071700405905
The paper
Longman, R. W. (2000). Iterative learning control and repetitive control for engineering practice. International Journal of Control. https://doi.org/10.1080/002071700405905

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.