The DOI matches its Crossref record.
FORCES NLP: an efficient implementation of interior-point methods for multistage nonlinear nonconvex programs
Abstract
Real-time implementation of optimisation-based control and trajectory planning can be very challenging for nonlinear systems. As a result, if an implementation based on a fixed linearisation is not suitable, the nonlinear problems are typically locally approximated online, in order to leverage the speed and robustness of embedded solvers for convex quadratic programs (QP) developed during the last decade. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that, using simple standard building blocks from nonlinear programming, combined with a structure-exploiting linear system solver, it is possible to achieve computation times in the range typical of solvers for QPs, while retaining nonlinearities and solving the nonlinear programs (NLP) to local optimality. The implemented algorithm is an interior-point method with approximate Hessians and adaptive barrier rules, and is provided as an extension to the C code generator FORCES. Three detailed examples are provided that illustrate a significant improvement in control performance when solving NLPs, with computation times that are comparable with those achieved by fast approximate schemes and up to an order of magnitude faster than the state-of-the-art interior-point solver IPOPT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Learning-Based Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Racing
Kabzan, J., Hewing, L., Liniger, A., & Zeilinger, M. N. (2019) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2019.2926677 · Cited by 462
Malyuta, D., Reynolds, T. P., Szmuk, M., Lew, T., Bonalli, R., Pavone, M., & Açıkmeşe, B. (2022) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2022.3187542 · Cited by 259
Perception-Aware Perching on Powerlines With Multirotors
Paneque, J. L., Dios, J. R. M.-D., Ollero, A., Hanover, D., Sun, S., Romero, A., & Scaramuzza, D. (2022) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2022.3145514 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Zanelli, A., Domahidi, A., Jerez, J., & Morari, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Control
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-05-22
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-29
- ISSN
- 0020-7179 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5820
- OpenAlex
- W2607001947
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FORCES NLP: an efficient implementation of interior-point methods for multistage nonlinear nonconvex programs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207179.2017.1316017
- The paper
- Zanelli, A., Domahidi, A., Jerez, J., & Morari, M. (2020). FORCES NLP: an efficient implementation of interior-point methods for multistage nonlinear nonconvex programs. International Journal of Control. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2017.1316017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.