The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perception-Aware Perching on Powerlines With Multirotors
Open accessAbstract
Multirotor aerial robots are becoming widely used for the inspection of powerlines. To enable continuous, robust inspection without human intervention, the robots must be able to perch on the powerlines to recharge their batteries. Highly versatile perching capabilities are necessary to adapt to the variety of configurations and constraints that are present in real powerline systems. This letter presents a novel perching trajectory generation framework that computes perception-aware, collision-free, and dynamically-feasible maneuvers to guide the robot to the desired final state. Trajectory generation is achieved via solving a Nonlinear Programming problem using the Primal-Dual Interior Point method. The problem considers the full dynamic model of the robot down to its single rotor thrusts and minimizes the final pose and velocity errors while avoiding collisions and maximizing the visibility of the powerline during the maneuver. The generated maneuvers consider both the perching and the posterior recovery trajectories. The framework adopts costs and constraints defined by efficient mathematical representations of powerlines, enabling online onboard execution in resource-constrained hardware. The method is validated on-board an agile quadrotor conducting powerline inspection and various perching maneuvers with final pitch values of up to 180 $^{\circ }$ . The developed code is available online at: https://github.com/grvcPerception/pa_powerline_perching
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
NMPC used in the outer loop of a cascaded architecture can cause problems because the NMPC generator does not consider the limitations posed by the low-level controller, and the generated trajectory could violate the actuation limitations of the UAV, resulting in an unfeasible solution.
“This approach allows to attain the perception-objectives, but it can cause problems as the NMPC generator does not consider the limitations posed by the low-level controller [8], [18]. As a consequence, the generated trajectory could violate the actuation limitations of the UAV resulting in an unfeasible solution.”
From A Perception-Aware NMPC for Vision-Based Target Tracking and Collision Avoidance with a Multi-Rotor UAV (2022) · cites this paper as [8]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- 10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9341100 · DOI
- 10.1177/0278364911434236 · DOI
- 10.1115/1.4032250 · DOI
- 10.1126/scirobotics.aau6637 · DOI
- 10.1109/LRA.2015.2506001 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6631206 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139845 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9636690 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS.2018.8593669 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICUAS48674.2020.9213946 · DOI
- 10.1109/IROS.2018.8593739 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9197281 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2411 · DOI
- 10.1093/comjnl/11.2.211 · DOI
- 10.1109/TRO.2022.3177279 · DOI
- 10.1109/LRA.2016.2640362 · DOI
- 10.1002/oca.939 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12532-018-0139-4 · DOI
- 10.1080/00207179.2017.1316017 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-540-36119-0_4 · DOI
- 10.1109/LRA.2021.3131690 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dmytruk, A., Silano, G., Bicego, D., Licea, D. B., & Saska, M. (2022) · 2022 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) · doi:10.1109/icuas54217.2022.9836071 · Cited by 8
“In this context, various works have investigated NMPC strategies considering perception-objectives [8], [17], [18].”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Paneque, J. L., Dios, J. R. M.-D., Ollero, A., Hanover, D., Sun, S., Romero, A., & Scaramuzza, D.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
- Published
- 2022-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 3077-3084
- ISSN
- 2377-3766 (ISSN-L)
- 2377-3774
- OpenAlex
- W4210447370
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.zora.uzh.ch
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- European Commission (HORIZON2020, 788247, 871479)
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (871479)
- H2020 European Research Council (864042)
- Ministerio de Universidades
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Power Line Inspection Robots
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
- Keywords
- quadrotor, trajectory generation, nonlinear programming, primal-dual interior point method, collision avoidance, dynamic feasibility, resource-constrained devices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review