The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma: an analysis based on operations strategy
Abstract
There is a growing need for operations management models that contribute to the continuous improvement of company processes, among them we highlight lean manufacturing, Six Sigma and, more recently, Lean Six Sigma (LSS). This article aims (1) to identify and analyse the differences and complementarities in the production decision areas for each one of the three models; (2) to identify the competitive priorities that lead to the best performance as a result of policies followed in the decision areas as a result of the adopted model. First, a theoretical conceptual model was developed based on a review of the literature, followed by a exploratory research questions applied to manufacturing companies that use the lean, Six Sigma or LSS manufacturing models in southern Brazil. The main results show that there are differences in the models in relation to the importance of the decision areas and the performance achieved in the competitive priorities. Individually, lean manufacturing, Six Sigma and LSS have varying degrees of importance in the Facilities, Vertical Integration and Production Planning and Control decision areas. The performance dimensions with the best performance are speed, quality, reliability and cost.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lean implementation and its benefits to production industry
Singh, B., Garg, S. K., Sharma, S. K., & Grewal, C. (2010) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/20401461011049520 · Cited by 223
Cited by
Lean production practices and bundles: a comparative analysis
Sahoo, S., & Yadav, S. (2018) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/ijlss-01-2017-0002 · Cited by 55
An integrated DEMATEL Six Sigma hybrid framework for manufacturing process improvement
Gupta, A., Sharma, P., Jain, A., Xue, H., Malik, S. C., & Jha, P. C. (2023) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-019-03341-9 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Drohomeretski, E., Gouvea da Costa, S. E., Pinheiro de Lima, E., & Garbuio, P. A. D. R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-10-15
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 804-824
- ISSN
- 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-588X
- OpenAlex
- W2097744476
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.