The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An empirical examination of stakeholder pressures, green operations practices and environmental performance
Open accessAbstract
This study explores two key attributes constituting green operations practices (i.e. internal green management and green product/process design) and examines the links of adopting green operations practices with its antecedent factors (stakeholder pressures) and consequent performance outcomes (environmental performance). Data collected from 167 manufacturing firms in the UK were analysed using structural equation modelling. The results reveal that stakeholder pressures have a significant positive effect on internal green management, and that internal green management significantly affects green product/process design. The two attributes of green operations practices are significantly and positively related to environmental performance. More specifically, we find that internal green management fully mediates the relationship between stakeholder pressures and green product/process design and the relationship between stakeholder pressures and environmental performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83 · Cited by 9,406
An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378802500207 · Cited by 6,293
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258887 · Cited by 5,846
The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach
Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.06.001 · Cited by 3,310
Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training
Sarkis, J., Gonzalez‐Torre, P., & Adenso‐Diaz, B. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001 · Cited by 1,518
The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration
Zhao, X., Huo, B., Selen, W., & Yeung, J. H. Y. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.04.004 · Cited by 813
Cited by
Guerci, M., Longoni, A., & Luzzini, D. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1065431 · Cited by 589
Yu, W., Ramanathan, R., & Nath, P. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.005 · Cited by 308
Self-citationAdoption of business analytics and impact on performance: a qualitative study in retail
Ramanathan, R., Philpott, E., Duan, Y., & Cao, G. (2017) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2017.1336800 · Cited by 155
Self-citationLee, M., Pak, A., & Roh, T. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3755 · Cited by 131
Liu, J., Ma, Y., Appolloni, A., & Cheng, W. (2021) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-04-2020-0035 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, W., & Ramanathan, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-06-25
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 6390-6407
- ISSN
- 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-588X
- OpenAlex
- W2045566207
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 23.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An empirical examination of stakeholder pressures, green operations practices and environmental performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207543.2014.931608
- The paper
- Yu, W., & Ramanathan, R. (2015). An empirical examination of stakeholder pressures, green operations practices and environmental performance. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.931608
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
