Cited by 164Quality and Supply ManagementManagement and Optimization TechniquesOperations Management Techniques

Lean practices implementation and their relationships with operational responsiveness and company performance: an Italian study

Bevilacqua, Maurizio, Ciarapica, Filippo Emanuele, De Sanctis, Ilaria·2017·International Journal of Production Research

Abstract

Although many firms report large benefits from lean implementation, a lot of scepticism still remains regarding attainable results and the possibility to apply Lean approach outside high-volume manufacturing and stable context. In this work, combining field interviews with literature review, theoretical connections have been developed among Lean manufacturing techniques, operational responsiveness and company growth performances. A conceptual model has been proposed for investigating the network of influences among lean practices (supplier management, human resource management, just-in-time and total quality management practices), operational responsiveness (Product mix variety, Product innovation and Time effectiveness) and company growth performances in Italian companies. Using structural equation modelling, a second-order confirmatory factor analysis has been used to test the hypothesised relationships in the structural models. This study highlights that the operational responsiveness is only partially connected to a Lean strategy of a company. Indeed, the lean practices implementations are negatively influenced by product mix variety and innovation, while positively influenced by time effectiveness variables. Moreover, product mix variety and time effectiveness are the main characteristics of the operational responsiveness that positively influences company growth performances. So time effectiveness could be considered as a mediator between Lean best practices and firm growth. Moreover, no direct relationship has been found between lean bundles and firm’s performances. Lack of resources and mainly poor communication and managers’ commitment and support seem to be the main obstacles of lean implementation and success.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207543.2016.1211346

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F. E., & De Sanctis, I.
Affiliations
Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
Corresponding author
Ciarapica, Filippo Emanuele
Venue
International Journal of Production Research
Published
2016-07-22
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
769-794
ISSN
  • 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-588X
OpenAlex
W2487742414
Cited by
164
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 7
FWCI
26.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Production Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Operations Management Techniques
Keywords
lean manufacturing, operational responsiveness, firm performance, product innovation, time effectiveness, supplier management, human resource management, just-in-time, total quality management, lean implementation barriers, Italian firms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review