The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital twin-driven rapid individualised designing of automated flow-shop manufacturing system
Abstract
Under a mass individualisation paradigm, the individualised design of manufacturing systems is difficult as it involves adaptive integrating both new and legacy machines for the formation of part families with uncertainty. A systematic virtual model mirroring the real world of manufacturing system is essential to bridge the gap between its design and operation. This paper presents a digital twin-driven methodology for rapid individualised designing of the automated flow-shop manufacturing system. The digital twin merges physics-based system modelling and distributed semi-physical simulation to provide engineering solution analysis capabilities and generates an authoritative digital design of the system at pre-production phase. An effective feedbacking of collected decision-support information from the intelligent multi-objective optimisation of the dynamic execution is presented to boost the applicability of the digital twin vision in the designing of AFMS. Finally, a bi-level iterative coordination mechanism is proposed to achieve optimal design performance for required functions of AFMS. A case study is conducted to prove the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed methodology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The proposed improvements are reached by reducing the energy consumption [37,40]”
From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“Also, there are papers that mainly belong to the first group but also offer services of the second group ([39,40,50,70]), and vice versa ([56,61,62]).”
From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems
Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017) · Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4 · Cited by 3,727 · cited 1×
“…the DT (Digital Twin), which was fi rstly adopted in spacecraft design by NASA (Boschert and Rosen 2016; Brenner and Hummel 2017; Ferguson, Bennett, and Ivashchenko 2017; Grieves 2014; Grieves and Vickers 2017), can be viewed as a combination of mod-elling-based method and optimisation-based method.”
MethodDigital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data
Tao, F., Cheng, J., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Zhang, H., & Sui, F. (2018) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1 · Cited by 2,920
Self-citationAtashpaz-Gargari, E., & Lucas, C. (2007) · IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) · doi:10.1109/cec.2007.4425083 · Cited by 2,741
An overview of bilevel optimization
Colson, B., Marcotte, P., & Savard, G. (2007) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-007-0176-2 · Cited by 1,452
The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0
Moeuf, A., Pellerin, R., Lamouri, S., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., & Barbaray, R. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1372647 · Cited by 1,188
Digital Twin—The Simulation Aspect
Boschert, S., & Rosen, R. (2016) · Mechatronic Futures · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32156-1_5 · Cited by 1,158
Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin
Tuegel, E. J., Ingraffea, A. R., Eason, T. G., & Spottswood, S. M. (2011) · International Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1155/2011/154798 · Cited by 1,119
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.6221021 · Cited by 1,099
Design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems
Koren, Y., & Shpitalni, M. (2010) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2011.01.001 · Cited by 781
C2PS: A Digital Twin Architecture Reference Model for the Cloud-Based Cyber-Physical Systems
Alam, K. M., & El Saddik, A. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2657006 · Cited by 741
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cochran D. S., 2016, Transactions of the ASME: Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 138, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review
Jones, D., Snider, C., Nassehi, A., Yon, J., & Hicks, B. (2020) · CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002 · Cited by 2,422
Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications
Liu, M., Fang, S., Dong, H., & Xu, C. (2020) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.017 · Cited by 2,075
Digital twin: origin to future
Singh, M., Fuenmayor, E., Hinchy, E., Qiao, Y., Murray, N., & Devine, D. (2021) · Applied System Innovation · doi:10.3390/asi4020036 · Cited by 1,038
Digital twin paradigm: A systematic literature review
Semeraro, C., Lezoche, M., Panetto, H., & Dassisti, M. (2021) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2021.103469 · Cited by 1,129
Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing
Cimino, C., Negri, E., & Fumagalli, L. (2019) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2019.103130 · Cited by 874
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Q., Zhang, H., Leng, J., & Chen, X.
- Affiliations
- Guangdong University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Leng, Jiewu
- Venue
- International Journal of Production Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-05-08
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3903-3919
- ISSN
- 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-588X
- OpenAlex
- W2799347500
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 28.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Production Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51675108, 51705091)
- Science and Technology Plan Project of Guangzhou (201804020092)
- Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province of China (2015B010128007, 2016A010106006)
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2015ZZ079)
- Science and Technology Plan Project of Guangdong Province of China (2015B010128007, 2016A010106006)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Manufacturing Process and Optimization
- Keywords
- digital twin, part families, semi-physical simulation, multi-objective optimization, decision support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
