Cited by 13Digital Transformation in IndustryImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietyFood Supply Chain Traceability

The internet of things in supply chain management: past, present, and future – a systematic literature review and implementation framework

Vlachos, Ilias, Graham, Gary·2025·International Journal of Production Research

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) was initially adopted to enhance efficiency and inform decision-making in supply chains (SC), but it is now increasingly utilised as a strategic tool to transform them. No prior study has systematically reviewed the past, present, and future of IoT in the SC context, especially amid the rise of advanced technologies like Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI). This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of 572 articles and a systematic literature review of 196 IoT studies published in the SC context between 2009 and 2025 (as of March). It applies descriptive, topic, and thematic analyses. This study develops the Theories, Context, Methods – Antecedents, Implementation, Outcomes – Emerging themes (TCM-AIO-E) framework. It tracks the ‘past’ and evolution of IoT applications on SC with several methods, like topic evolution analysis. The TCM-AIO-E framework guides scholars and practitioners with ‘present’ adoption and implementation mechanisms for transportation, warehouse, procurement, and resource management, focusing on decision-making, visibility, traceability, and agility. It reveals ‘future’ opportunities, significant barriers, and research gaps in the transformative role of IoT. The study proposes research questions to guide future research and help companies transition from IoT automation to autonomous and autodidact supply chains and production systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207543.2025.2553824

Cites

145 of 145 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vlachos, I., & Graham, G.
Affiliations
  • Excelia Business School (FR)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Corresponding author
Vlachos, Ilias
Venue
International Journal of Production Research
Published
2025-09-15
Volume
63
Issue
24
Pages
10555-10585
ISSN
  • 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-588X
OpenAlex
W4414191861
Cited by
12
References
145
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Production Research (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Supply Chain Traceability
Keywords
Internet of Things, supply chain management, IoT adoption, generative AI, supply chain traceability, supply chain visibility, supply chain agility, implementation barriers, transportation, warehouse management, procurement, resource management, decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review