The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: evidence from five countries
Abstract
Based on social-cognitive theory (Bandura, 1997), this paper examined whether perceived self-efficacy is a universal psychological construct that accounts for variance within various domains of human functioning. Perceived self-efficacy is not only of a task-specific nature, but it can also be identified at a more general level of functioning. General self-efficacy (GSE) is the belief in one’s competence to tackle novel tasks and to cope with adversity in a broad range of stressful or challenging encounters, as opposed to specific self-efficacy, which is constrained to a particular task at hand. The study aimed at exploring the relations between GSE and a variety of other psychological constructs across several countries. Relations between general self-efficacy and personality, well-being, stress appraisals, social relations, and achievements were examined among 8796 participants from Costa Rica, Germany, Poland, Turkey, and the USA. Across countries, the findings provide evidence for associations between perceived general self-efficacy and the selected variables. The highest positive associations were with optimism, self-regulation, and self-esteem, whereas the highest negative associations emerged with depression and anxiety. Academic performance is also associated with self-efficacy as hypothesized. The replication across languages or cultures adds significance to these findings. The relations between self-efficacy and other personality measures remained stable across cultures and samples. Thus, perceived general self-efficacy appears to be a universal construct that yields meaningful relations with other psychological constructs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Both want conflicts and motivational interference are negatively related to self-regulation (Fries et al., 2008; Grund and Fries, 2014), while self-efficacy is strongly associated with self-regulation (Luszczynska et al., 2005).”
From Context Stability in Habit Building Increases Automaticity and Goal Attainment (2022) · cites this paper as Luszczynska et al., 2005
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063 · Cited by 7,456
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory
Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., & Covi, L. (1974) · Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830190102 · Cited by 4,604
The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663 · Cited by 4,028
TARGET ARTICLE: Hope Theory: Rainbows in the Mind
Snyder, C. R. (2002) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1304_01 · Cited by 3,737
Social Cognitive Theory in Cultural Context
Bandura, A. (2002) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00092 · Cited by 2,092
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Bandura A, 1999, Guilford Press
- Feffing D, 1996, Diagnostica, 42, 284
- 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page
- Schwarzer R(Ed.), 1992, Self‐efficacy: Thought control of action
- Schwarzer R, 1997, World Psychology, 3, 177
- Schwarzer R, 1999, Freie Universität Berlin
- Schwarzer R, 1982, Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 3, 27
- Spielberger CD, 1979, Preliminary manual for the State‐Trait Personality Inventory
- Wieland‐Eckelmann R, 1990, Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 3, 167
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,001 of 1,001
الوکیل, س. أ. م. (2021) · مجلة جامعة الفيوم للعلوم التربوية والنفسية · doi:10.21608/jfust.2021.60555.1264
Metadata
- Authors
- Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez‐Doña, B., & Schwarzer, R.
- ORCID
- Schwarzer, Ralf
- Venue
- International Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 80-89
- ISSN
- 0020-7594 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-066X
- OpenAlex
- W2153318572
- Cited by
- 1,127
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 66
- FWCI
- 18.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Keywords
- general self-efficacy, cross-cultural universality, optimism, self-regulation, self-esteem, depression, anxiety, academic performance, personality, well-being, stress appraisal, interpersonal relationships, social cognitive theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review