The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Collective school‐type identity: Predicting students’ motivation beyond academic self‐concept
Abstract
In Germany, according to their prior achievement students are tracked into different types of secondary school that provide profoundly different options for their future educational careers. In this paper we suggest that as a result, school tracks clearly differ in their social status or reputation. This should translate into different collective school‐type identities for their students, irrespective of the students’ personal academic self‐concepts. We examine the extent to which collective school‐type identity systematically varies as a function of the school track students are enrolled in, and the extent to which students’ collective school‐type identity makes a unique contribution beyond academic self‐concept and school track in predicting scholastic motivation. In two cross‐sectional studies a measure of collective school‐type identity is established and applied to explain motivational differences between two school tracks in Berlin. In Study 1 (N = 39 students) the content of the collective school‐type identity is explored by means of an open format questionnaire. Based on these findings a structured instrument (semantic differential) to measure collective school‐type identity is developed. In Study 2 (N = 1278 students) the assumed structure with four subscales (Stereotype Achievement, Stereotype Motivation, Stereotype Social, and Compensation) is proved with confirmatory factor analysis. This measure is used to compare the collective school‐type identity across school tracks and predict motivational outcomes. Results show large differences in collective school‐type identity between students of different school tracks. Furthermore, these differences can explain motivational differences between school tracks. Collective school‐type identity has incremental predictive power for scholastic motivation, over and above the effects of academic self‐concept and school track.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similar patterns were found by Knigge and Hannover ' s (2011) German mixed-methods study when adolescents were asked what people in general think about students in the prevocational and students in the pre-academic track.”
From The Role of School in Adolescents’ Identity Development. A Literature Review (2019) · cites this paper as Knigge and Hannover 2011
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 33 · Cited by 40
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- 10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80 · DOI
- Bryk A.S., 1992, Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods
- 10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.366 · DOI
- Crocker J., 1998, The handbook of social psychology, 504
- Crocker J., 1998, Confronting racism, 169
- Helmke A., 1992, Selbstvertrauen und schulische Leistungen
- 10.1037/a0015558 · DOI
- Köller O., 2004, Konsequenzen von Leistungsgruppierungen
- Köller O., 2002, Entwicklungspsychologie, 756
- 10.1026/0033-3042.58.2.103 · DOI
- Lukesch H., 2004, PSB‐R 6–13: Pruefsystem fuer Schul‐ und Bildungsberatung fuer 6. bis 13. Klassen: Revidierte Fassung
- Markus H., 1977, Self‐schemata and processing information about the self, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 63, 10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312021004799 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.364 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.337 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312034004691 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x · DOI · Paper page
- Prenzel M., 2007, PISA 2006. Die Ergebnisse der dritten internationalen Vergleichsstudie
- 10.1007/BF03173016 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470316696 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1201/9781439821862 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1198/106186002760180608 · DOI
- 10.1026/0012-1924.51.1.21 · DOI
- 10.3102/00346543046003407 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.317 · DOI · Paper page
- Bundesamt Statistisches, 2007, Bildungsstand der Bevölkerung
- 10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613 · DOI · Paper page
- Stoeber J., 2002, Skalendokumentation “Persoenliche Ziele von SchuelerInnen”
- 10.1037/017220 · DOI
- Taylor D.M., 2003, Self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts
- 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.009 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.788 · DOI
- Turner J.C., 1987, Rediscovering the social group: A self‐categorization theory
- Wissinger J., 2003, Konzepte fuer die Hauptschule. Ein Bildungsgang zwischen Konstruktion und Kritik, 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Knigge, M., & Hannover, B.
- Affiliations
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Knigge, Michel
- Venue
- International Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-15
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 191-205
- ISSN
- 0020-7594 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-066X
- OpenAlex
- W1991248677
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology and Education Studies
- Keywords
- academic self-concept, educational tracking, school reputation, stereotype threat, compensation, German secondary education
- MeSH terms
- Achievement, Adolescent, Berlin, Child, Female, Germany, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Motivation, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Semantic Differential, Social Desirability, Social Environment, Social Identification, Students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collective school‐type identity: Predicting students’ motivation beyond academic self‐concept. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207594.2010.529907
- The paper
- Knigge, M., & Hannover, B. (2011). Collective school‐type identity: Predicting students’ motivation beyond academic self‐concept. International Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2010.529907