Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 40Education, Achievement, and GiftednessSchool Choice and PerformanceSociology and Education Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Collective school‐type identity: Predicting students’ motivation beyond academic self‐concept

Knigge, Michel, Hannover, Bettina·2011·International Journal of Psychology

Abstract

In Germany, according to their prior achievement students are tracked into different types of secondary school that provide profoundly different options for their future educational careers. In this paper we suggest that as a result, school tracks clearly differ in their social status or reputation. This should translate into different collective school‐type identities for their students, irrespective of the students’ personal academic self‐concepts. We examine the extent to which collective school‐type identity systematically varies as a function of the school track students are enrolled in, and the extent to which students’ collective school‐type identity makes a unique contribution beyond academic self‐concept and school track in predicting scholastic motivation. In two cross‐sectional studies a measure of collective school‐type identity is established and applied to explain motivational differences between two school tracks in Berlin. In Study 1 (N = 39 students) the content of the collective school‐type identity is explored by means of an open format questionnaire. Based on these findings a structured instrument (semantic differential) to measure collective school‐type identity is developed. In Study 2 (N = 1278 students) the assumed structure with four subscales (Stereotype Achievement, Stereotype Motivation, Stereotype Social, and Compensation) is proved with confirmatory factor analysis. This measure is used to compare the collective school‐type identity across school tracks and predict motivational outcomes. Results show large differences in collective school‐type identity between students of different school tracks. Furthermore, these differences can explain motivational differences between school tracks. Collective school‐type identity has incremental predictive power for scholastic motivation, over and above the effects of academic self‐concept and school track.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207594.2010.529907

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 33 · Cited by 40

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80 · DOI
  2. Bryk A.S., 1992, Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.366 · DOI
  4. Crocker J., 1998, The handbook of social psychology, 504
  5. Crocker J., 1998, Confronting racism, 169
  6. Helmke A., 1992, Selbstvertrauen und schulische Leistungen
  7. 10.1037/a0015558 · DOI
  8. Köller O., 2004, Konsequenzen von Leistungsgruppierungen
  9. Köller O., 2002, Entwicklungspsychologie, 756
  10. 10.1026/0033-3042.58.2.103 · DOI
  11. Lukesch H., 2004, PSB‐R 6–13: Pruefsystem fuer Schul‐ und Bildungsberatung fuer 6. bis 13. Klassen: Revidierte Fassung
  12. Markus H., 1977, Self‐schemata and processing information about the self, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 63, 10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63 · DOI
  13. 10.3102/00028312021004799 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.364 · DOI
  15. 10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.337 · DOI
  16. 10.3102/00028312034004691 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Prenzel M., 2007, PISA 2006. Die Ergebnisse der dritten internationalen Vergleichsstudie
  19. 10.1007/BF03173016 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/9780470316696 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1201/9781439821862 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1198/106186002760180608 · DOI
  23. 10.1026/0012-1924.51.1.21 · DOI
  24. 10.3102/00346543046003407 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.317 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Bundesamt Statistisches, 2007, Bildungsstand der Bevölkerung
  27. 10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Stoeber J., 2002, Skalendokumentation “Persoenliche Ziele von SchuelerInnen”
  29. 10.1037/017220 · DOI
  30. Taylor D.M., 2003, Self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts
  31. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.009 · DOI
  32. 10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.788 · DOI
  33. Turner J.C., 1987, Rediscovering the social group: A self‐categorization theory
  34. Wissinger J., 2003, Konzepte fuer die Hauptschule. Ein Bildungsgang zwischen Konstruktion und Kritik, 96

Metadata

Authors
Knigge, M., & Hannover, B.
Affiliations
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Knigge, Michel
Venue
International Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-15
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
191-205
ISSN
  • 0020-7594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-066X
OpenAlex
W1991248677
Cited by
40
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology and Education Studies
Keywords
academic self-concept, educational tracking, school reputation, stereotype threat, compensation, German secondary education
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Berlin, Child, Female, Germany, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Motivation, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Semantic Differential, Social Desirability, Social Environment, Social Identification, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collective school‐type identity: Predicting students’ motivation beyond academic self‐concept. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207594.2010.529907
The paper
Knigge, M., & Hannover, B. (2011). Collective school‐type identity: Predicting students’ motivation beyond academic self‐concept. International Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2010.529907