The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time perspective and environmental engagement: A meta‐analysis
Abstract
Environmental issues entail both a social conflict (private vs. public interests) and a temporal conflict (short‐ vs. long‐term interests). This paper focuses on the role temporal concerns play in influencing environmental engagement by quantitatively integrating results of studies that assessed the associations between time perspective and proenvironmental attitudes and behaviors. The meta‐analysis included a total of 19 independent samples and 6,301 participants from seven countries (Australia, Brazil, Germany, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, and the United States). Results showed that the associations between time perspective and proenvironmental behaviors were higher than those for proenvironmental attitudes. Supporting predictions, the associations between future time perspective and proenvironmental behaviors were strong and nontrivial compared to those for the combined past–present time perspective. The findings indicate that future time perspective seems to play an important role in influencing individuals’ attitudes and behaviors towards the environment. Implications of the findings for theory and practice are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
(1990) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,269
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,395
Hardin, G. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · Cited by 25,167
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
Wasserman, S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,326
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change
Change, I. P. O. C. (2007) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511546013 · Cited by 7,729
Hardin, G. (2009) · Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research · doi:10.1080/19390450903037302 · Cited by 6,367
Climate change 2001: synthesis report
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-4660 · Cited by 5,272
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.
Freeman, P. R., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531069 · Cited by 4,784
Cited by
Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kooij, D. T. A. M., Kanfer, R., Betts, M., & Rudolph, C. W. (2018) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000306 · Cited by 573
Verma, V. K., & Chandra, B. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.047 · Cited by 512
Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.12.006 · Cited by 441
Self-citationThe influence of cultural values on pro-environmental behavior
Chwialkowska, A., Bhatti, W. A., & Glowik, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122305 · Cited by 361
Tam, K.-P., & Chan, H.-W. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.09.001 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Milfont, T. L., Wilson, J., & Diniz, P.
- Venue
- International Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-27
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 325-334
- ISSN
- 0020-7594 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-066X
- OpenAlex
- W2152601794
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 39.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time perspective and environmental engagement: A meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207594.2011.647029
- The paper
- Milfont, T. L., Wilson, J., & Diniz, P. (2012). Time perspective and environmental engagement: A meta‐analysis. International Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.647029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
