The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological Adaptation of Chinese Sojourners in Canada
Abstract
Psychological adaptation during acculturation was studied among 68 Chinese sojourners (students and visiting scholars from China and Hong Kong), 28 Chinese immigrant and Chinese‐Canadian students, 30 Chinese students and scholars in China, and 33 non‐Chinese Canadian students. Each participant completed questionnaires pertaining to various aspects of their lives and personalities, including: health beliefs and behaviours; problems and ways of coping; social contact and acculturation attitudes; psychological and physical health; and subjective adaptation. The Chinese sojourners reported lower English fluency, lower ease of making friendships, more adaptation and communication problems, and lower subjective adaptation than non‐Chinese Canadian, or Chinese‐Canadian students. The Chinese sojourners experienced less desired and actual contact, more contact incongruity, more separation and less assimilation than Chinese‐Canadian students. The Chinese sojourners reacted to their problems with less wishful thinking and self‐blame, and more tension reduction, and the seeking of informational support than non‐Chinese Canadian students. There were significant differences between groups in health concept and health causation, and believed and utilized health ways. Health causation, and believed and utilised health ways were the most important factors influencing the Chinese sojourners' health status. The Chinese sojourners experienced more problems, but tended to use fewer health ways after‐arrival than pre‐departure. The Chinese also experienced poorer health, especially poorer psychological health after‐arrival than pre‐departure. The longitudinal and cross‐sectional analysis of the Chinese sojourners' Cawte scores supported the U‐curve hypothesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.150 · Cited by 4,845
Cited by
A review of the acculturation experiences of international students
Smith, R. A., & Khawaja, N. G. (2011) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.08.004 · Cited by 1,130
“For example, Chataway and Berry (1989) and Zheng and Berry (1991) examined hich life changes are appraised as the most difficult by particular groups of international students.”
BackgroundAcculturation and Adaptation in a New Society
Berry, J. W. (1992) · International Migration · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2435.1992.tb00776.x · Cited by 992
Self-citationLead Article - Immigration, Acculturation, and Adaptation
Berry, J. W. (1997) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1080/026999497378467 · Cited by 678
Self-citationThe Meaning of “Being Chinese” and “Being American”: Variation among Chinese American Young Adults
Tsai, J. L., Ying, Y.-W., & Lee, P. A. (2000) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022100031003002 · Cited by 502
Where's the "Culture" in Cross-Cultural Transition?: Comparative Studies of Sojourner Adjustment
Ward, C., & Kennedy, A. (1993) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022193242006 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, X., & Berry, J. W.
- Venue
- International Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 451-470
- ISSN
- 0020-7594 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-066X
- OpenAlex
- W2007437123
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological Adaptation of Chinese Sojourners in Canada. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207599108247134
- The paper
- Zheng, X., & Berry, J. W. (1991). Psychological Adaptation of Chinese Sojourners in Canada. International Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599108247134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.