The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Where's the "Culture" in Cross-Cultural Transition?: Comparative Studies of Sojourner Adjustment
Abstract
Research examined psychological and sociocultural adjustment during cross-cultural transitions in two groups of sojourners. One hundred and forty-five Malaysian and Singaporean students in New Zealand and 156 Malaysian students in Singapore participated in the studies. In line with past sojourner research, results revealed that locus of control, life changes, social difficulty, and social support variables predicted psychological adjustment during cross-cultural transitions. In contrast, length of residence in the host culture, cultural distance, interaction with host nationals and co-nationals, extroversion, acculturation strategies, and mood disturbance predicted sociocultural adaptation. In addition to these general findings, culture-specific results also emerged; high host national contact and cultural integration were associated with mood disturbance in Malaysian sojourners in Singapore. As expected, Malaysian and Singaporean students in New Zealand experienced greater social difficulty than Malaysian students in Singapore although there was no significant difference in mood disturbance. Also consistent with the hypothesis, the magnitude of the correlation between psychological and sociocultural adjustment was significantly greater in the Singapore-based compared to the New Zealand-based sample.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
Cited by
Conceptual approaches to acculturation.
Berry, J. W. (2003) · Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research. · doi:10.1037/10472-004 · Cited by 2,097
Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): Components and Psychosocial Antecedents
Benet‐Martínez, V., & Haritatos, J. (2005) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00337.x · Cited by 1,384
A review of the acculturation experiences of international students
Smith, R. A., & Khawaja, N. G. (2011) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.08.004 · Cited by 1,130
“Ward and colleagues were the first to make the distinction between two types of daptation: psychological and sociocultural (Searle & Ward, 1990; Ward & Kennedy, 1992, 1993a).”
BackgroundInfluentialTheoretical models of culture shock and adaptation in international students in higher education
Zhou, Y., Jindal-Snape, D., Topping, K., & Todman, J. (2008) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070701794833 · Cited by 755
Lead Article - Immigration, Acculturation, and Adaptation
Berry, J. W. (1997) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1080/026999497378467 · Cited by 678
Metadata
- Authors
- Ward, C., & Kennedy, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 221-249
- ISSN
- 0022-0221 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5422
- OpenAlex
- W2119653306
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Where's the "Culture" in Cross-Cultural Transition?: Comparative Studies of Sojourner Adjustment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022022193242006
- The paper
- Ward, C., & Kennedy, A. (1993). Where's the "Culture" in Cross-Cultural Transition?: Comparative Studies of Sojourner Adjustment. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022193242006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.