Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 442

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

UAV path planning using artificial potential field method updated by optimal control theory

Chen, Yong-bo, Luo, Guan-chen, Mei, Yue-song, Yu, Jian-qiao, Su, Xiao-long·2016·International Journal of Systems Science

Abstract

The unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) path planning problem is an important assignment in the UAV mission planning. Based on the artificial potential field (APF) UAV path planning method, it is reconstructed into the constrained optimisation problem by introducing an additional control force. The constrained optimisation problem is translated into the unconstrained optimisation problem with the help of slack variables in this paper. The functional optimisation method is applied to reform this problem into an optimal control problem. The whole transformation process is deduced in detail, based on a discrete UAV dynamic model. Then, the path planning problem is solved with the help of the optimal control method. The path following process based on the six degrees of freedom simulation model of the quadrotor helicopters is introduced to verify the practicability of this method. Finally, the simulation results show that the improved method is more effective in planning path. In the planning space, the length of the calculated path is shorter and smoother than that using traditional APF method. In addition, the improved method can solve the dead point problem effectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207721.2014.929191

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.07.017 · DOI
  2. 10.3724/SP.J.1218.2012.00519 · DOI
  3. Caves A.D.J., 2010, Human-automation collaborative RRT for UAV mission path planning
  4. 10.3724/SP.J.1218.2010.00568 · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1218.2010.00568
  5. 10.1007/0-387-28356-0_10 · DOI
  6. Fang Q., 2006, Acta Automatica Sinica, 32, 767
  7. Li B., 2011, Optimal control problems with constraints on the state and control and their applications
  8. 10.1243/09544100JAERO665 · doi:10.1243/09544100jaero665
  9. Liu B., 2000, The modern control theory
  10. 10.1016/j.simpat.2008.08.005 · doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2008.08.005
  11. 10.1177/0278364908090949 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1007/s10846-011-9586-0 · DOI
  13. Sun Jinsheng L.J., 1994, Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 26, 48
  14. Wu S.Z., 2008, Optimal control theory and application
  15. Xiao-Qun C., 2012, Acta Physica Sinica, 61, 1
  16. 10.1007/s11771-008-0104-x · doi:10.1007/s11771-008-0104-x
  17. Yin L., 2009, Journal of System Simulation, 21, s3325

Cited by

See all 442

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Y.-B., Luo, G.-C., Mei, Y.-S., Yu, J.-Q., & Su, X.-L.
Venue
International Journal of Systems Science
Published
2014-06-18
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
1407-1420
ISSN
  • 0020-7721 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5319
OpenAlex
W2075956742
Cited by
442
References
1
FWCI
9.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: UAV path planning using artificial potential field method updated by optimal control theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207721.2014.929191
The paper
Chen, Y.-B., Luo, G.-C., Mei, Y.-S., Yu, J.-Q., & Su, X.-L. (2016). UAV path planning using artificial potential field method updated by optimal control theory. International Journal of Systems Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2014.929191

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.