The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gender, Risk, and Retirement
Abstract
(2001). Gender, Risk, and Retirement. Journal of Economic Issues: Vol. 35, Papers From The 2001 AFEE Meeting, pp. 345-356.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gender Differences in Preferences
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.448 · Cited by 5,694
Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking
Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007 · Cited by 1,357
Hard won and easily lost: a review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood
Vandello, J. A., & Bosson, J. K. (2013) · Psychology of Men & Masculinity · doi:10.1037/a0029826 · Cited by 871
Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk?
Sila, V., Gonzalez, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.003 · Cited by 804
Psychological Research on Retirement
Wang, M., & Shi, J. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115131 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernasek, A., & Shwiff, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Issues
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 345-356
- ISSN
- 0021-3624 (ISSN-L)
- 1946-326X
- OpenAlex
- W2222892958
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender, Risk, and Retirement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00213624.2001.11506368
- The paper
- Bernasek, A., & Shwiff, S. (2001). Gender, Risk, and Retirement. Journal of Economic Issues. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2001.11506368
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
