The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Response Variation in E-Mail Surveys: An Exploration
Abstract
As e-mail and other related technologies have diffused rapidly into a large and heterogeneous population, researchers have begun to explore the possibility of using e-mail as a tool for survey research. However. studies of the technique have primarily compared response rates for studies that use both e-mail and postal mail survey techniques. Research into e-mail as a survey method needs to develop the kind of richness that is found in the literature on traditional postal mail survey methods. This article takes a first step in developing that literature with an in-depth comparison of three studies that used e-mail surveys for data collection. Details are provided on methods for sampling and survey techniques. Hypothesized relationships between issue salience and response rate, and between pre-survey notification and response time, were generally supported.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys
Dillman, D. A. (1991) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.001301 · Cited by 1,311
Cited by
Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review
Fan, W., & Yan, Z. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015 · Cited by 1,521
E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review
Sheehan, K. B. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00117.x · Cited by 1,441
Self-citationVan Selm, M., & Jankowski, N. W. (2006) · Quality and Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-005-8081-8 · Cited by 905
Response Rate and Response Quality of Internet-Based Surveys: An Experimental Study
Deutskens, E., de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Oosterveld, P. (2004) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1023/b:mark.0000021968.86465.00 · Cited by 835
The institutional environment and social entrepreneurship intentions
Urban, B., & Kujinga, L. (2017) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research · doi:10.1108/ijebr-07-2016-0218 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheehan, K. B., & McMillan, S. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Advertising Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 45-54
- ISSN
- 0021-8499 (ISSN-L)
- 1740-1909
- OpenAlex
- W71637537
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response Variation in E-Mail Surveys: An Exploration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00218499.1999.12466620
- The paper
- Sheehan, K. B., & McMillan, S. J. (1999). Response Variation in E-Mail Surveys: An Exploration. Journal of Advertising Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218499.1999.12466620
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.