Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Response Variation in E-Mail Surveys: An Exploration

Sheehan, Kim Batel, McMillan, Sally J.·1999·Journal of Advertising Research

Abstract

As e-mail and other related technologies have diffused rapidly into a large and heterogeneous population, researchers have begun to explore the possibility of using e-mail as a tool for survey research. However. studies of the technique have primarily compared response rates for studies that use both e-mail and postal mail survey techniques. Research into e-mail as a survey method needs to develop the kind of richness that is found in the literature on traditional postal mail survey methods. This article takes a first step in developing that literature with an in-depth comparison of three studies that used e-mail surveys for data collection. Details are provided on methods for sampling and survey techniques. Hypothesized relationships between issue salience and response rate, and between pre-survey notification and response time, were generally supported.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00218499.1999.12466620

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Sheehan, K. B., & McMillan, S. J.
Venue
Journal of Advertising Research
Published
1999-07
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
45-54
ISSN
  • 0021-8499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-1909
OpenAlex
W71637537
Cited by
317
References
1
FWCI
29.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response Variation in E-Mail Surveys: An Exploration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00218499.1999.12466620
The paper
Sheehan, K. B., & McMillan, S. J. (1999). Response Variation in E-Mail Surveys: An Exploration. Journal of Advertising Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218499.1999.12466620

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.