The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 56 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Process Writing Approach: A Meta-analysis
Abstract
The process approach to writing instruction is one of the most popular methods for teaching writing. The authors conducted meta-analysis of 29 experimental and quasi-experimental studies conducted with students in Grades 1–12 to examine if process writing instruction improves the quality of students’ writing and motivation to write. For students in general education classes, process writing instruction resulted in a statistically significant, but relatively modest improvement in the overall quality of writing (average weighted effect size [ES] = 0.34). Variation in ES was not related to grade, reliability of the writing quality measure, professional development, genre assessed, or quality of study. The process writing approach neither resulted in a statistically significant improvement in students’ motivation nor enhanced the quality of struggling writers’ compositions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is also a conceptual problem with written assessments: the final output is assessed, but not its manner of execution (Graham and Sandmel, 2014).”
From Using version control to document genuine effort in written assignments: a protocol with examples for universities (2023) · cites this paper as Graham and Sandmel, 2014
In the citing paper
“Graham and Sandmel (2014) has echoed calls for improving the teaching of writing and this proposed method offers a quantitative and rapidly marked solution.”
From Using version control to document genuine effort in written assignments: a protocol with examples for universities (2023) · cites this paper as Graham and Sandmel, 2014
In the citing paper
“it assesses writing execution over the entire writing cycle (Graham and Sandmel, 2014);”
From Using version control to document genuine effort in written assignments: a protocol with examples for universities (2023) · cites this paper as Graham and Sandmel, 2014
In the citing paper
“The method is comparable to the process writing approach (Graham and Sandmel, 2014).”
From Using version control to document genuine effort in written assignments: a protocol with examples for universities (2023) · cites this paper as Graham and Sandmel, 2014
Citations
Cites
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S. W., & Fitzgerald, J. (2005) · Cited by 2,327
Self-citationSmith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, T. I. (1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,123
Writing: Teachers and Children at Work
Cook, G. E., Stotsky, S. L., & Graves, D. H. (1986) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357919 · Cited by 1,834
A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445 · Cited by 1,609 · cited 23×
“For example, Graham and Perin (2007) limited their review to studies conducted only with students in Grades 4–12.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationSelf-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1994) · Cited by 1,492
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,200
Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments.
Hedges, L. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.490 · Cited by 1,030
Quality Indicators for Group Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in Special Education
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440290507100202 · Cited by 1,023
Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching
Witte, S. P., Larson, R. L., & Hillocks, G. (1987) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357721 · Cited by 694
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- References marked with an asterisk (*) indicate studies included in the meta-analysis
- 2005, Rising to the challenge: Are high school graduates prepared for college and work?
- *Adams V. A., 1971, A study of the effects of two methods of teaching composition to twelfth graders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)
- Atwell N., 1987, In the middle: Reading, writing, and learning from adolescents
- *Beachem M. T., 1984, An investigation of two writing process interventions on the rhetorical effectiveness of sixth grade writers
- Breetvelt I., 1996, Theories, models and methodologies on writing research, 10
- Calkins L., 2008, Units of study for primary writing: A yearlong curriculum (K–2)
- *Croes M. J., 1990, The efficacy of employing a writing process approach for the instruction of language arts with learning disabled elementary students
- *Curry K. A., 1997, A comparison of the writing products of students with learning disabilities in inclusive and resource room settings using different writing approaches
- *Dougans J. Y., 1993, Teaching writing to fifth-grade children: The process/conference approach versus the traditional method
- *Eads V. A., 1989, A study of the effects of teacher training in writing on students’ writing abilities
- *Fleury B., 1988, Cumulative editing writing instruction: Implications for staff development
- *Ganong F. L., 1974, Teaching writing through the use of a program based on the work of Donald M. Murray
- *Gauntlett J. F., 1978, Project WRITE and its effect on the writing of high school students
- Goldring A., 2003, Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2, 1
- Graham, S. 2006. Writing. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational psychology (pp. 457–478). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum
- *Green L. C., 1991, The effects of word processing and a process approach to writing on the reading and writing achievement, revision and editing strategies, and attitudes towards writing of third-grade Mexican American students
- Greene J., 2000, The cost of remedial education: How much Michigan pays when students fail to learn basic skills
- Greenwald E., 1999, National assessment of Educational progress: 1998 report card for the nation and the states
- Hammill D. D., 1996, Test of written language–3
- *Hansen T. L., 1989, A comparison of the effects of two process writing programs and a traditional program on the writing development of first-grade children
- *Hayes B. L., 1984, The effects of implementing process writing into a seventh grade English curriculum
- *Kelley K. R., 1984, The effect of writing instruction on reading comprehension and story writing ability
- MacArthur C., 1991, Learning Disability Research and Practice, 6, 201
- 10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_9 · DOI
- *Marker E. S., 2000, The impact of the writer's conference on the writing achievement of at-risk fourth-grade students
- *Moore M. A., 1987, The effect of word processing technology in a developmental writing program on writing quality, attitude towards composing, and revision strategies of fourth and fifth grade students
- 2003, The neglected R: The need for a writing revolution
- *Pantier T. F., 1999, A comparison of writing performance of fifth-grade students using the process writing approach and the Shurley method
- Persky H. R., 2003, The nation's report card: Writing 2002 (NCES 2003–529)
- *Pollington M. F., 1999, Intermediate grade writers self-perception: A comparison of the effects of writing workshop and traditional instruction
- *Reimer M., 2001, The effect of a traditional, a process writing, and a combined talking and writing instructional approach on the quality of secondary English students’ written response
- Rijlaarsdam G., 2006, Handbook of writing research, 41
- *Roberts C. A., 2002, The influence of teachers’ professional development at the Tampa Bay Area Writing Project on student writing performance
- Rosenberg M., 2000, MetaWin: Statistical software for meta-analysis (Version 2)
- Salahu-Din D., 2008, The Nation's Report Card: Writing 2007 (NCES 2008–468)
- *Scannella A. M., 1982, A writing-as-process model as a means for improving compositions and attitudes toward composition in the high school
- Shadish W. R., 1999, ES: A computer program for effect size calculation
- *Umbach B. T., 1990, A comparison of two methods of teaching written language to low-performing fourth graders in two rural schools
- Van den Bergh H, 1996, The science of writing, 207
- 2007, Technical details of WWC-conducted computations
- Wienke J. W., 1981, Strategies for improving elementary school students’ writing skills
- Zaragoza N., 1992, Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 7, 184
- Zucker C., 1993, Reading Teacher, 46, 660
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades.
Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S. A., & Harris, K. R. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029185 · Cited by 828
Self-citationMeyer, J., Jansen, T., Schiller, R., Liebenow, L. W., Steinbach, M., Horbach, A., & Fleckenstein, J. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100199 · Cited by 311
Writing: importance, development, and instruction
Graham, S., Rouse, A. G., & McKeown, D. (2012) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2 · Cited by 270
Self-citationA Meta-Analysis of Writing Interventions for Students With Learning Disabilities
Rouse, A. G., & Graham, S. (2014) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/0014402914527238 · Cited by 256
Self-citationResearch-Based Writing Practices and the Common Core
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Santangelo, T. (2015) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/681964 · Cited by 244
Self-citationTechnology and writing: Review of research
Williams, C., & Beam, S. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.024 · Cited by 236
Effectiveness of Literacy Programs Balancing Reading and Writing Instruction: A Meta‐Analysis
Graham, S., Liu, X., Aitken, A. A., Ng, C., Bartlett, B. J., Harris, K. R., & Holzapfel, J. (2017) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.194 · Cited by 196
Self-citationTeaching children to write: A meta-analysis of writing intervention research
Koster, M., Tribushinina, E., de Jong, P. F., & van den Bergh, H. (2015) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2015.07.02.2 · Cited by 136
Kent, S. C., & Wanzek, J. (2015) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654315619491 · Cited by 168
Huang, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2019) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2019.1649223 · Cited by 159
The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching
Nuzzo, E., & Velásquez, D. C. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327 · Cited by 138
Wilson, J., Ahrendt, C., Fudge, E. A., Raiche, A., Beard, G., & MacArthur, C. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104208 · Cited by 118
Teaching writing in primary education: Classroom practice, time, teachers’ beliefs and skills.
Rietdijk, S., van Weijen, D., Janssen, T., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2018) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000237 · Cited by 133
Liu, Z.-M., Hwang, G.-J., Chen, C.-Q., Chen, X.-D., & Ye, X.-D. (2026) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2024.2389923 · Cited by 115
Common Core State Standards, Writing, and Students with LD: Recommendations
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2013) · Learning Disabilities Research and Practice · doi:10.1111/ldrp.12004 · Cited by 101
Self-citationSmedt, F. D., Keer, H. V., & Merchie, E. (2015) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9590-z · Cited by 110
Lee, M.-K. (2015) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.08.003 · Cited by 101
Kim, Y. G., Yang, D., Reyes, M., & Connor, C. M. (2021) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100408 · Cited by 82
eRevis(ing): Students’ revision of text evidence use in an automated writing evaluation system
Wang, E. L., Matsumura, L. C., Correnti, R. J., Litman, D. J., Zhang, H., Howe, E., Magooda, A., & Quintana, R. (2020) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100449 · Cited by 73
The impact of L2 writing instructional approaches on student writing motivation and engagement
Yu, S., Jiang, L., & Zhou, N. (2020) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168820957024 · Cited by 62
Li, H., Wang, Y., Luo, S., & Huang, C. (2024) · Journal of Asian Public Policy · doi:10.1080/17516234.2024.2363128 · Cited by 73
The Effects of Blogging on EFL Writing Achievement
Özdemir, E., & Aydın, S. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.521 · Cited by 57
Wolbers, K. A., Dostal, H. M., Graham, S., Cihak, D. F., Kilpatrick, J. R., & Saulsburry, R. (2015) · The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education · doi:10.1093/deafed/env022 · Cited by 54
Self-citationElementary Grade Intervention Approaches to Treat Specific Learning Disabilities, Including Dyslexia
Otaiba, S. A., Rouse, A. G., & Baker, K. (2018) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2018_lshss-dyslc-18-0022 · Cited by 54
Deane, P. (2018) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2018.1513844 · Cited by 62
Improving writing skills through technology‐based instruction: A meta‐analysis
Little, C. W., Clark, J. C., Tani, N. E., & Connor, C. M. (2018) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3114 · Cited by 50
Writing in young bilingual children: Review of research
Williams, C., & Falhaber, E. L. (2018) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2018.10.012 · Cited by 57
Improving Writing in Primary Schools through a Comprehensive Writing Program
Rietdijk, S., Janssen, T., van Weijen, D., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2017) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2017.09.02.04 · Cited by 50
Integrating Multimodal Arguments Into High School Writing Instruction
Howell, E., Butler, T., & Reinking, D. (2017) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1177/1086296x17700456 · Cited by 62
Improving Writing Skills of Students in Turkey: a Meta-analysis of Writing Interventions
Graham, S., TAVŞANLI, Ö. F., & Kaldırım, A. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09639-0 · Cited by 59
Self-citationUsing automated feedback to develop writing proficiency
Huang, Y., & Wilson, J. (2021) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102675 · Cited by 43
Teacher-Implemented Writing Instruction for Elementary Students: A Literature Review
Finlayson, K., & McCrudden, M. T. (2019) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2019.1604278 · Cited by 41
Flipped learning wheel (FLW): a framework and process design for flipped L2 writing classes
Luo, Z., O’Steen, B., & Brown, C. (2020) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-020-00121-y · Cited by 43
Xie, Q., & Cui, Y. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101019 · Cited by 39
Graham, S., & Alves, R. A. (2021) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-021-10188-9 · Cited by 38
Self-citationImsa-ard, P. (2020) · rEFLections · doi:10.61508/refl.v27i2.247153 · Cited by 37
Effects of Writing Instruction on Kindergarten Students’ Writing Achievement: An Experimental Study
Jones, C. D. (2014) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2013.836466 · Cited by 37
Effective writing instruction for students in grades 6 to 12: a best evidence meta-analysis
Graham, S., Cao, Y.-C., Kim, Y., Lee, J., Tate, T., Collins, P., Cho, M., Moon, Y., Chung, H. Q., & Olson, C. B. (2024) · Reading & Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-024-10539-2 · Cited by 46
Self-citationArticulating a Sociocognitive Construct of Writing Expertise for the Digital Age
Corrigan, J. A., & Slomp, D. (2021) · The Journal of Writing Analytics · doi:10.37514/jwa-j.2021.5.1.05 · Cited by 40
Blikstad‐Balas, M., Roe, A., & Klette, K. (2018) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088317751123 · Cited by 35
Exploring feedback and regulation in online writing classes with keystroke logging
Bowen, N. E. J. A., Thomas, N., & Vandermeulen, N. (2022) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2022.102692 · Cited by 36
Calkins, L. M., & Ehrenworth, M. (2016) · The Reading Teacher · doi:10.1002/trtr.1499 · Cited by 35
Profiling writers: analysis of writing dynamics among college students
Escorcia, D., Passerault, J.-M., Ros, C., & Pylouster, J. (2017) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-016-9166-6 · Cited by 46
Teaching Writing in Grades 7–9 in Urban Schools in Chinese Societies in Asia
Hsiang, T. P., Graham, S., & Wong, P. M. (2017) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.213 · Cited by 33
Self-citationGuo, W., Bai, B., & Song, H. (2021) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2021.102578 · Cited by 54
Schrodt, K., Elleman, A. M., FitzPatrick, E. R., Hasty, M. M., Kim, J. K., Tharp, T. J., & Rector, H. (2019) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2019.1577778 · Cited by 41
The Cognition Hypothesis, the Triadic Componential Framework and the SSARC Model
Robinson, P. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.013 · Cited by 35
Reutzel, D. R. (2015) · The Reading Teacher · doi:10.1002/trtr.1387 · Cited by 31
A Research Synthesis on Effective Writing Instruction in Primary Education
Smedt, F. D., & Keer, H. V. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1219 · Cited by 30
From Needs Analysis to Task Selection, Design, and Sequencing
Gilabert, R., & Malicka, A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.014 · Cited by 30
Wilcox, K. C., Jeffery, J. V., & Gardner-Bixler, A. (2015) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9588-6 · Cited by 29
Acts of Writing: A Compilation of Six Models that Define the Processes of Writing
Sharp, L. A. (2016) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.12973/iji.2016.926a · Cited by 29
Academic language and the quality of written arguments and explanations of Chilean 8th graders
Figueroa, J., Meneses, A., & Chandía, E. (2017) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-017-9806-5 · Cited by 29
Idea Sharing: Process-Based Approach to Writing in Malaysian English Education
Li, K. L. (2019) · PASAA · doi:10.58837/chula.pasaa.58.1.12 · Cited by 28
López‐Escribano, C., Babarro, J. M., & Pérez-López, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841573 · Cited by 26
Ellis, R. (2021) · Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1515/cjal-2021-0009 · Cited by 26
Jiang, D., & Kalyuga, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.932291 · Cited by 26
Using Multimodal Writing to Motivate Struggling Students to Write
Darrington, B., & Dousay, T. A. (2015) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0901-7 · Cited by 26
The instructional effectiveness of two virtual approaches: Processes and product
García‐Martín, J., & García-Sánchez, J.-N. (2018) · Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed ) · doi:10.1016/j.psicoe.2018.02.003 · Cited by 25
‘Poetry is dying’: Creating a (re)new(ed) pedagogical vision for teaching poetry
Creely, E. (2019) · The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy · doi:10.1007/bf03652031 · Cited by 25
Relationship Between Writing Motivation Levels and Writing Skills Among Secondary School Students
SÜĞÜMLÜ, Ü., Mutlu, H. H., & ÇİNPOLAT, E. (2019) · lnternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education · doi:10.26822/iejee.2019553345 · Cited by 25
Task-Based Language Teaching as an Innovation
den Branden, K. V. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.035 · Cited by 24
Why Task? Task as a Unit of Analysis for Language Education
Sasayama, S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.004 · Cited by 24
An Enriched Writers' Workshop for Beginning Writers with Developmental Disabilities
Sturm, J. (2012) · Topics in Language Disorders · doi:10.1097/tld.0b013e318272609b · Cited by 20
Informing Understanding of Young Students’ Writing Challenges and Opportunities
Vue, G., Hall, T. E., Robinson, K. H., Ganley, P., Elizalde, E., & Graham, S. (2015) · Learning Disability Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0731948715604571 · Cited by 27
Self-citationArıcı, A., & Kaldırım, A. (2015) · The Anthropologist · doi:10.1080/09720073.2015.11891883 · Cited by 23
Cheng, G. (2019) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1655769 · Cited by 22
Wang, H., & Troia, G. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1213929 · Cited by 37
Kadmiry, M. (2021) · Arab World English Journal · doi:10.24093/awej/vol12no1.14 · Cited by 21
Bygate, M., Samuda, V., & den Branden, K. V. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.003 · Cited by 27
Peltzer, K., Lorca, A. L., Krause, U.-M., & Busse, V. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101935 · Cited by 20
Avalos, M. A., Perez, X., & Thorrington, V. (2019) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2019.1635056 · Cited by 20
Süreç Temelli Yaratıcı Yazma Uygulamalarının Yazılı Anlatıma ve Yazmaya İlişkin Tutuma Etkisi
Erdoğan, Ö., & Yangin, B. (2014) · Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.17240/aibuefd.2014.14.1-5000091521 · Cited by 20
La eficacia instruccional de dos enfoques virtuales: procesos y producto
García‐Martín, J., & Sánchez, J. N. G. (2018) · Revista de Psicodidáctica · doi:10.1016/j.psicod.2018.02.002 · Cited by 19
Troia, G. A., Wang, H., & Lawrence, F. (2022) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102100 · Cited by 24
Academic Standards for Writing
Troia, G. A., Olinghouse, N. G., Mo, Y., Hawkins, L. K., Kopke, R. A., Chen, A., Wilson, J., & Stewart, K. A. (2015) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/683984 · Cited by 24
The Relationship Between Writing Self-Efficacy and Writing Skill: A Meta-Analysis Study
Atasoy, A. (2021) · TED EĞİTİM VE BİLİM · doi:10.15390/eb.2021.10024 · Cited by 17
Jalaluddin, I. B. (2019) · Journal Of Research Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education · doi:10.37134/jrpptte.vol9.no2.6.2019 · Cited by 17
Desempeños en la calidad de explicaciones y argumentaciones en estudiantes chilenos de 8º básico
Figueroa, J., Meneses, A., & Chandía, E. (2018) · Revista signos · doi:10.4067/s0718-09342019000100031 · Cited by 16
The Effect of a PBWMIP on Writing Success and Attitude toward Writing
TAVŞANLI, Ö. F., Bilgin, A., Yıldırım, K., Rasinski, T. V., & Tschantz, B. (2020) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2020.1846006 · Cited by 16
Using modeled writing to support English-only and English-learner second-grade students
Mohr, K. A. J. (2016) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2016.1169391 · Cited by 15
Task-Based Language Assessment
Norris, J. M., & East, M. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108868327.029 · Cited by 15
Lam, R. (2015) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688215597119 · Cited by 19
Carter, H., Abbott, J., & Wright, K. L. (2022) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2022.14.01.03 · Cited by 21
Examining College Writing Readiness
Duncheon, J. C., & Tierney, W. G. (2014) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131725.2014.912712 · Cited by 14
Discourses of writing and learning to write in L2 writing curriculum in Chinese universities
Yu, S., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, E. D. (2022) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688221113929 · Cited by 13
Evidence-Based Practices of English Language Teaching: A Meta-Analysis of Meta-Analyses
Alsowat, H. H. (2020) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v13n11p75 · Cited by 16
Levin, D. M., Paz, S. D. L., Lee, Y., & Escola, E. N. (2021) · Learning Disabilities: a Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.18666/ldmj-2021-v26-i1-10380 · Cited by 13
Sun, J., Motevalli, S., & Chan, N. N. (2024) · Qualitative Research in Education · doi:10.17583/qre.12938 · Cited by 12
Writing Strategies for Elementary Multilingual Writers: A Systematic Review
Lewis, B. P. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14070759 · Cited by 18
High School Students’ Common Errors in Writing Essays
Ho, P. V. P., & Trinh, D. T. P. (2019) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v9n6p309 · Cited by 12
Hashey, A. I., Miller, K. M., & Foxworth, L. L. (2020) · Intervention in School and Clinic · doi:10.1177/1053451220910733 · Cited by 12
Digitizing the story-writing process for EFL primary learners: An exploratory study
Cheung, A. (2021) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688211027772 · Cited by 12
Rezai, A., Ashkani, P., & Ismail, S. M. (2023) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-023-09934-7 · Cited by 12
Alpar, Ö. (2025) · European Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12973/eu-jer.14.4.1291 · Cited by 23
Kuo, H., Chang, C., Wang, J.-P., Wu, E. L., & Li, P. (2024) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101513 · Cited by 22
Integrating Writing Process with Quantum Learning Framework in English Language Teaching
Masrur, I., Irawati, E., & Sulistyo, G. H. (2020) · Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian dan Pengembangan · doi:10.17977/jptpp.v5i3.13262 · Cited by 11
Sharpening Students' Racial Literacies through Multimodal Subversion
Howell, E., & Dyches, J. (2022) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.1255 · Cited by 11
Müller, N., Utesch, T., & Busse, V. (2023) · Unterrichtswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s42010-023-00173-2 · Cited by 13
The Effect of the Process Approach on Students’ Writing Success: A Meta-Analysis
Kansızoğlu, H. B., & CÖMERT, Ö. B. (2017) · Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal · doi:10.14812/cuefd.292046 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Graham, S., & Sandmel, K.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- ORCID
- Graham, Steve
- Venue
- The Journal of Educational Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 396-407
- ISSN
- 0022-0671 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-0675
- OpenAlex
- W1970391825
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- process writing, writing instruction, writing quality, writing motivation, struggling writers, middle and high school students, writing genres, teacher professional development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review