The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teaching and Learning with Humor: Experiment and Replication
Abstract
Two experiments concerning humor in teaching and learning in higher education are presented. The first study used relevant humor in a one-semester statistics course in an experimental group and no humor in a control group. One hundred sixty-one students participated, and the results showed significant differences between the two groups in favor of the group learning with humor. No significant sex differences nor interactions were found. The second experiment was a replication of the first one, using 132 students in a one-semester introductory psychology course. The students (all females) were divided randomly into two groups. Humor was used in one, and the same teacher taught the second group without using humor. Again, significant differences were found: The group studying with humor had higher scores on the final exam. Explanations for the ways in which humor in teaching can influence student learning are given.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While I suspect few readers would be able to recite dry pra ¯timoks : a rules after just one hearing, the narratives discussed above-monks' munching on monkey meat, nuns' love charms, monks' babysitting, and nuns and their adult toys-are, I suggest, far more memorable, and arguably, effective than their non-humourous counterparts.”
From Locating Humour in Indian Buddhist Monastic Law Codes: A Comparative Approach (2009) · cites this paper as Ziv (1988)
In the citing paper
“Moreover, is not humour an effective pedagogical device?”
From Locating Humour in Indian Buddhist Monastic Law Codes: A Comparative Approach (2009) · cites this paper as Ziv (1988)
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, J. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203771587 · Cited by 25,373
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
GLASS, G. V. (1976) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x005010003 · Cited by 4,890
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- Biehler R. F., 1984, Psychology applied to teaching.
- Borg W. R., 1981, Educational research.
- 10.1080/03634527909378339 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0663.72.4.511 · DOI
- Chapman A. J., 1978, Practical aspects of memory.
- Curran F. W., 1972, A developmental study of cartoon humor and its use in facilitating learning.
- Davis A. P., 1980, Children’s humor.
- Gibb J. D., 1964, An experimental comparison of the humorous lecture and non-humorous lecture in informative speech.
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1967.tb01181.x · DOI
- Gruner C. R., 1976, Humor and laughter: Theory, research and applications.
- Hauck W. E., 1972, Journal of Experimental Education, 40, 52, 10.1080/00220973.1972.11011352 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0663.69.1.61 · DOI
- Kennedy A. J., 1972, An experimental study of the effects of humorous message content upon ethos and persuasiveness.
- Kilpela D. E., 1961, An experimental study of the effect of humor on persuasion.
- 10.1037/h0026141 · DOI
- 10.1080/03075078512331378726 · DOI
- Markiewicz D., 1972, The effects of humor on persuasion.
- Perreault R. M., 1972, A study of the effects of humor in advertising as can be measured by by-product recall tests.
- 10.2466/pms.1981.52.2.427 · DOI
- Taylor P. M., 1964, Central States Speech Journal, 5, 295
- 10.1037/0022-0663.73.1.27 · DOI
- Weinberg M. D., 1973, The interactional effect of humor and anxiety on academic performance.
- 10.1080/0142569830040201 · DOI
- Youngman R. C., 1966, An experimental investigation of the effect of germane humor versus nongermane humor in an informative communication.
- 10.1037/0022-0663.72.2.170 · DOI
- Ziv A., 1979, L’humor en education: Approche psychologique.
- Ziv A., 1981, The psychology of humor.
- Ziv A., 1984, Personality and sense of humor.
- 10.1080/0144341860060105 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The impact of humor in advertising: a review
Weinberger, M. G., & Gulas, C. S. (1992) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1992.10673384 · Cited by 533
Bennett, H. J. (2003) · Southern Medical Journal · doi:10.1097/01.smj.0000066657.70073.14 · Cited by 103
Falkenberg, I., Buchkremer, G., Bartels, M., & Wild, B. (2011) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.10.009 · Cited by 92
Locating Humour in Indian Buddhist Monastic Law Codes: A Comparative Approach
Clarke, S. (2009) · Journal of Indian Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10781-008-9052-x · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Ziv, A.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Ziv, Avner
- Venue
- The Journal of Experimental Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-15
- ISSN
- 0022-0973 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-0683
- OpenAlex
- W1997506216
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Experimental Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Humor Studies and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Keywords
- humor in teaching, student learning, statistics education, higher education, exam performance, replication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review