Cited by 168Categorization, perception, and languageColor perception and designColor Science and Applications

The Meanings of Color

Wright, Benjamin, Rainwater, Lee·1962·The Journal of General Psychology

Abstract

(1962). The Meanings of Color. The Journal of General Psychology: Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 89-99.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00221309.1962.9711531

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, B., & Rainwater, L.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
The Journal of General Psychology
Published
1962-07
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
89-99
ISSN
  • 0022-1309 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-0888
OpenAlex
W2125208217
Cited by
168
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of General Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Color perception and design
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Color Science and Applications
Keywords
color perception, meanings of colour, color symbolism, color psychology
MeSH terms
Color

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review