Accrual Mobility: Job Mobility in Higher Education through Responsibility Accrual
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Endogenous change has been observed but has been difficult to explain.
“Endogenous change has been observed (e.g., Miner and Estler, 1985; Miner, 1991; Burgelman, 1994; Feldman, 2000), but it has been difficult to explain.”
From Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change (2003) · cites this paper as Miner and Estler, 1985
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556620 · Cited by 4,020 · see citing works
- Authors
- Miner, A. S., & Estler, S. E.
- ORCID
- Miner, Anne S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1985-03
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 121-143
- ISSN
- 0022-1546 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4640
- OpenAlex
- W1983047548
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Learning Practices
- Keywords
- student mobility, international student enrollment, higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
