The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Beyond the Rhetoric: Trends in the Relative Value of Teaching and Research in Faculty Salaries
Abstract
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, among all faculty activities research consistently showed publishing and other forms of scholarly productivity as the strongest positive predictors of faculty pay. Classroom teaching was consistently negatively related to pay. Now more than a decade after a host of institutional and state policies enacted to enhance the value of teaching, this paper examines changes in the monetary value of classroom teaching and publishing during the past five years. Results show that spending more time on teaching still means lower pay. Scholarly productivity remains the strongest behavioral predictor of pay although its importance may be stabilizing or slightly decreasing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Examining the predictive validity of NIH peer review scores
Lindner, M. D., & Nakamura, R. K. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126938 · Cited by 24
At the Heart of the Ikaahuk Archaeology Project
Hodgetts, L., & Kelvin, L. (2020) · Archaeologies of the Heart · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-36350-5_7 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Fairweather, J. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 401-422
- ISSN
- 0022-1546 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4640
- OpenAlex
- W2031649958
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
