The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Targeted Assessment Rubric: An Empirically Grounded Rubric for Interdisciplinary Writing
Abstract
A rubric to assess interdisciplinary writing was developed and tested through analysis of 84 pieces of freshmen, sophomore, and senior college student work. Four levels of interdisciplinary understanding are described across 4 dimensions of interdisciplinary work: (a) purposefulness, (b) disciplinary grounding, (c) integration, and (d) critical awareness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010) · Phi Delta Kappan · doi:10.1177/003172171009200119 · Cited by 4,231
Jung, C. G. (1956) · Collected Works, Volume 14 · doi:10.1515/9781400845927 · Cited by 885 · cited 2×
“collaborate across industry sectors, cultures, and disciplinary teams (National Academies, 2005; Levy & Murnane, 2004 ).”
Background
Cited by
Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support
Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., van Baalen, S., Klaassen, R., & Boon, M. (2020) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20347 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Mansilla, V. B., Duraisingh, E. D., Wolfe, C. R., & Haynes, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 334-353
- ISSN
- 0022-1546 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4640
- OpenAlex
- W2136434502
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeted Assessment Rubric: An Empirically Grounded Rubric for Interdisciplinary Writing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00221546.2009.11779016
- The paper
- Mansilla, V. B., Duraisingh, E. D., Wolfe, C. R., & Haynes, C. (2009). Targeted Assessment Rubric: An Empirically Grounded Rubric for Interdisciplinary Writing. The Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2009.11779016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
