“It was fun…I liked drawing my thoughts”: Using Drawings as a Part of the Focus Group Process with Children
Abstract
Little research in leisure studies has involved the use of drawings as a method of data collection with children. When involving children in qualitative research, one of the major challenges is for the adult investigator to capture the experiences and meanings from the children's perspective. This article discusses four contexts in which drawings can contribute to the research process when conducting focus groups with children: 1) to facilitate a relaxed atmosphere, 2) to gain insight into the children's perspective, 3) to provide structure and focus the discussion, and 4) to recognize and reduce the potential of group-think. The manuscript concludes by recommending that drawings can be used as a methodological technique to help elicit meaningful responses from children.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
'Consensus narratives' or 'group think' is a characteristic aspect of collective knowledge production in group interviews.
“While these can be immensely valuable, 'consensus narratives' or 'group think' is a characteristic aspect of such collective knowledge production (Yuen, 2004).”
From Child participatory research methods: Attempts to go ‘deeper’ (2017) · cites this paper as Yuen, 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Child participatory research methods: Attempts to go ‘deeper’
Horgan, D. (2017) · Childhood · doi:10.1177/0907568216647787 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yuen, F. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Yuen, Felice C.
- ORCID
- Yuen, Felice C.
- Venue
- Journal of Leisure Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 461-482
- ISSN
- 0022-2216 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-6417
- OpenAlex
- W65372683
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Leisure Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
- Keywords
- children's perspectives, qualitative research with children, groupthink, discussion facilitation, leisure studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review