The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence for Generalized Motor Programs Using Gait Pattern Analysis
Abstract
Human intra limb gait kinematics were analyzed via statistical and structural pattern recognition methods to determine the role of relative timing of limb segments within and between modes of gait. Five experienced runners were filmed while walking (3-6 km/hour) and running (8-12 km/hour) on a motor driven treadmill. Kinematic data consisted of relative timing of the four phases of the Philippson step cycle and intersegmental limb trajectories, determined from angle-angle diagrams. Despite marked decreases in absolute time durations within gaits remained constant over the speeds which were studied. Although a 2-fold increase in locomotor speed occurred in walking and a 1.5-fold speed increase occurred within running, the percentage of time spent in each of the Philippson phases was not significantly changed. However, significant differences in the time percentages and sequences of the step cycle phases were found between walking and running. Correlations between limb segment trajectories occurring in the different gaits showed strong coherence for overall step cycle patterns, but within step cycle phases and across speeds, selective phases displayed little correspondence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lewis, P. A., & Miall, R. C. (2003) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(03)00036-9 · Cited by 836
“Coordination, control and skill,”
Newell, K. M. (1985) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62541-8 · Cited by 423
Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic information to control natural limb movements?
Gandevia, S. C., & Burke, D. (1992) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0007254x · Cited by 359
The dynamical perspective on speech production: data and theory
Kelso, J. A. S., Saltzman, E. L., & Tuller, B. (1986) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30608-4 · Cited by 341
Implications of neural networks for how we think about brain function
Robinson, D. A. (1992) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00072563 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Shapiro, D. C., Zernicke, R. F., Gregor, R. J., & Diestel, J. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Motor Behavior
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1981-03
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-47
- ISSN
- 0022-2895 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-1027
- OpenAlex
- W2024467671
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for Generalized Motor Programs Using Gait Pattern Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00222895.1981.10735235
- The paper
- Shapiro, D. C., Zernicke, R. F., Gregor, R. J., & Diestel, J. D. (1981). Evidence for Generalized Motor Programs Using Gait Pattern Analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1981.10735235
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.