The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A short‐form scale to measure sexual discord in dyadic relationships
Abstract
This paper presents a new short‐form scale for use by clinical workers and researchers in measuring the degree or magnitude of a problem in the sexual component of a dyadic relationship, as seen by the respondent. The scale was designed for use in repeated administrations at periodic intervals in order that therapists might continually monitor and evaluate their clients' response to treatment. Internal consistency and test‐retest reliability were found to be in excess of .90, and the scale has a discriminant validity coefficient of .76.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change
Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (1976) · Cited by 3,036
Beaver, R. J., & Press, S. J. (1973) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529157 · Cited by 974
Behavior change : methodology, concepts, and practice
Hamerlynck, L. A., Handy, L. C., & Mash, E. J. (1974) · Research Press eBooks · Cited by 608
(2004) · Springer Texts in Statistics · doi:10.1007/b98963 · Cited by 517
Principles of Psychological Measurement
Dale, R. R., & Helmstadter, G. C. (1968) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119229 · Cited by 485
The Sexual Interaction Inventory: A new instrument for assessment of sexual dysfunction
LoPiccolo, J., & Steger, J. C. (1974) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01541141 · Cited by 296
An inventory for the measurement of female sexual arousability: The SAI
Hoon, E. F., Hoon, P. W., & Wincze, J. P. (1976) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01542081 · Cited by 196
Derogatis Sexual Functioning Inventory
Derogatis, L. R. (2010) · doi:10.4324/9781315881089.ch101 · Cited by 72
A Measurement Package for Clinical Workers
Hudson, W. W. (1982) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/002188638201800210 · Cited by 70
Self-citation
Cited by
The Assessment of Spouse Abuse: Two Quantifiable Dimensions
Hudson, W. W., & McIntosh, S. R. (1981) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/351344 · Cited by 614
Self-citationAdult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: A study of married couples
BUTZER, B., & CAMPBELL, L. (2008) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00189.x · Cited by 469
A systematic review of sexual satisfaction
Sánchez-Fuentes, M. D. M., Santos-Iglesias, P., & Sierra, J. C. (2014) · International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology · doi:10.1016/s1697-2600(14)70038-9 · Cited by 434
Psychometric measures of boredom: a review of the literature
Vodanovich, S. J. (2003) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980309600636 · Cited by 350
Champion, V. L., Wagner, L. I., Monahan, P. O., Daggy, J., Smith, L., Cohee, A., Ziner, K. W., Haase, J. E., Miller, K. D., Pradhan, K., et al. (2014) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28737 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Hudson, W. W., Harrison, D. F., & Crosscup, P. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1981-05
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-174
- ISSN
- 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8519
- OpenAlex
- W2105292695
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A short‐form scale to measure sexual discord in dyadic relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00224498109551110
- The paper
- Hudson, W. W., Harrison, D. F., & Crosscup, P. C. (1981). A short‐form scale to measure sexual discord in dyadic relationships. The Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498109551110
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
