The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sexual Scripts among Young Heterosexually Active Men and Women: Continuity and Change
Open accessAbstract
Whereas gendered sexual scripts are hegemonic at the cultural level, research suggests they may be less so at dyadic and individual levels. Understanding "disjunctures" between sexual scripts at different levels holds promise for illuminating mechanisms through which sexual scripts can change. Through interviews with 44 heterosexually active men and women aged 18 to 25, the ways young people grappled with culture-level scripts for sexuality and relationships were delineated. Findings suggest that, although most participants' culture-level gender scripts for behavior in sexual relationships were congruent with descriptions of traditional masculine and feminine sexuality, there was heterogeneity in how or whether these scripts were incorporated into individual relationships. Specifically, three styles of working with sexual scripts were found: conforming, in which personal gender scripts for sexual behavior overlapped with traditional scripts; exception-finding, in which interviewees accepted culture-level gender scripts as a reality, but created exceptions to gender rules for themselves; and transforming, in which participants either attempted to remake culture-level gender scripts or interpreted their own nontraditional styles as equally normative. Changing sexual scripts can potentially contribute to decreased gender inequity in the sexual realm and to increased opportunities for sexual satisfaction, safety, and well-being, particularly for women, but for men as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tolman, D. L., & Szalacha, L. A. (1999) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00338.x · Cited by 151
Cited by
Pornography use and loneliness: a bidirectional recursive model and pilot investigation
Butler, M. H., Pereyra, S. A., Draper, T. W., Leonhardt, N. D., & Skinner, K. B. (2018) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/0092623x.2017.1321601 · Cited by 109
Sexual self-concept: Testing a hypothetical model for men and women
Deutsch, A. R., Hoffman, L., & Wilcox, B. L. (2014) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.805315 · Cited by 84
Courtice, E. L., Czechowski, K., Noorishad, P.-G., & Shaughnessy, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673202 · Cited by 15
Olmstead, S. B., McMahan, K. D., & Anders, K. M. (2021) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-021-02042-4 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Masters, N. T., Casey, E., Wells, E. A., & Morrison, D. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-04-10
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 409-420
- ISSN
- 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8519
- OpenAlex
- W1997305011
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.