Sexual self-concept: Testing a hypothetical model for men and women
Abstract
One theoretical concept receiving modest attention in contemporary sex research is the sexual self-concept (SSC). However, a lack of cohesion within this research has culminated in a collection of SSC models which overlap one another but which are not exactly the same. Therefore, a unified conceptual model of SSC needs to be established. In addition, little research has examined potential differences between genders in SSC, as most SSC research has focused on women. Using Buzwell and Rosenthal's 1996 sexual selves model as a theoretical basis, a six-factor higher-order latent SSC model was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Lower-order factors for this model included multidimensional sexual self-esteem and sexual self-efficacy factors, as well as unidimensional arousal, anxiety, exploration, and commitment factors. A five-factor latent model (after removing the commitment and the resistance sexual self-efficacy factors) was the best-fitting model. This model was then tested for measurement and structural invariance between genders. Results indicated that while the measurement of SSC was similar between men and women, structural invariance did not hold, as men had a significantly higher latent SSC score compared to women. These findings have important implications for sexual self-concept research, as well as contributing to better understanding of human sexuality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Plausible values have been found to accurately resemble covariances between latent variables.
“Plausible values have been found to accurately resemble covariances between latent variables (Asparouhov & Muthén, 2010b), and as such have been used by researchers to obtain reliable scores for their measures that can be used for subsequent analyses (e.g., Ciarrochi et al., 2016;Deutsch, Hoffman, & Wilcox, 2014;Rhee et al., 2013).”
From Social media use intensity, social media use problems, and mental health among adolescents: Investigating directionality and mediating processes (2021) · cites this paper as Deutsch, Hoffman, & Wilcox, 2014
Cites
Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243205278639 · Cited by 9,367 · see citing works
Normative Sexuality Development in Adolescence: A Decade in Review, 2000–2009
Tolman, D. L., & McClelland, S. I. (2011) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00726.x · Cited by 640 · see citing works
The development of multiple role-related selves during adolescence
HARTER, S., BRESNICK, S., BOUCHEY, H. A., & WHITESELL, N. R. (1997) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579497001466 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boer, M., Stevens, G. W. J. M., Finkenauer, C., de Looze, M. E., & van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106645 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
- Authors
- Deutsch, A. R., Hoffman, L., & Wilcox, B. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
- Corresponding author
- Deutsch, Arielle R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-09-02
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 932-945
- ISSN
- 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8519
- OpenAlex
- W2112177690
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Sex Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Keywords
- sexual self-concept, sexual self-esteem, sexual self-efficacy, sexual arousal, sexual anxiety, sexual exploration, sexual commitment, gender differences, measurement invariance, structural invariance
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Self Concept, Sexuality, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review