Cited by 84Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGender Roles and Identity Studies

Sexual self-concept: Testing a hypothetical model for men and women

Deutsch, Arielle R., Hoffman, Lesa, Wilcox, Brian L.·2014·The Journal of Sex Research

Abstract

One theoretical concept receiving modest attention in contemporary sex research is the sexual self-concept (SSC). However, a lack of cohesion within this research has culminated in a collection of SSC models which overlap one another but which are not exactly the same. Therefore, a unified conceptual model of SSC needs to be established. In addition, little research has examined potential differences between genders in SSC, as most SSC research has focused on women. Using Buzwell and Rosenthal's 1996 sexual selves model as a theoretical basis, a six-factor higher-order latent SSC model was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Lower-order factors for this model included multidimensional sexual self-esteem and sexual self-efficacy factors, as well as unidimensional arousal, anxiety, exploration, and commitment factors. A five-factor latent model (after removing the commitment and the resistance sexual self-efficacy factors) was the best-fitting model. This model was then tested for measurement and structural invariance between genders. Results indicated that while the measurement of SSC was similar between men and women, structural invariance did not hold, as men had a significantly higher latent SSC score compared to women. These findings have important implications for sexual self-concept research, as well as contributing to better understanding of human sexuality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00224499.2013.805315

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deutsch, A. R., Hoffman, L., & Wilcox, B. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Deutsch, Arielle R.
Venue
The Journal of Sex Research
Published
2013-09-02
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
932-945
ISSN
  • 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-8519
OpenAlex
W2112177690
Cited by
84
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Sex Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
sexual self-concept, sexual self-esteem, sexual self-efficacy, sexual arousal, sexual anxiety, sexual exploration, sexual commitment, gender differences, measurement invariance, structural invariance
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Self Concept, Sexuality, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review