Cited by 83Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyMarriage and Sexual RelationshipsAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Dyadic Approach to Pornography Use and Relationship Satisfaction Among Heterosexual Couples: The Role of Pornography Acceptance and Anxious Attachment

Open access
Maas, Megan K., Vasilenko, Sara A., Willoughby, Brian J.·2018·The Journal of Sex Research

Abstract

The majority of research on pornography use within committed relationships has found such use to be associated with negative outcomes. However, given the variability in pornography use among couples, the current study sought to examine moderators in the association between pornography use and relationship satisfaction in a large sample of heterosexual matched-paired couples (N = 6,626). Actor-partner interdependence models (APIMs) revealed that for men who are more anxiously attached, more pornography use is associated with higher relationship satisfaction; whereas for women who are more anxiously attached, more pornography use is associated with lower relationship satisfaction. For men who are more accepting of pornography, more pornography use is associated with more relationship satisfaction; however, for men who are less accepting of pornography, more pornography use is associated with less relationship satisfaction. There was little difference in relationship satisfaction at differing levels of pornography use for women who are high in pornography acceptance. For women who are low in pornography acceptance, pornography use is associated with less relationship satisfaction. Results are discussed and recommendations for practitioners are made through the lens of symbolic interaction theory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00224499.2018.1440281

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The disconnect between pornography consumption and perceptions of pornography consumption can be divisive at the societal, relational, and individual levels.

    “This disconnect between pornography consumption and perceptions of pornography consumption can be divisive at the societal (Borgogna et al., 2022;Grubbs et al., 2019), relational (Maas et al., 2018;Perry, 2016Perry, , 2018)), and individual levels (Grubbs et al., 2018;Grubbs & Gola, 2019;Lewczuk et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. 10.1080/03637750701578648 · DOI
  2. 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/00224490009552033 · DOI
  4. Blumer H., 1986, Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method
  5. Bowlby J., 1980, Attachment and loss
  6. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.12.004 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/713847097 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01328.x · DOI
  9. 10.1177/1077801210382866 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s10508-016-0732-4 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/0093650208326465 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00612.x · DOI
  13. 10.1111/jomf.2009.71.issue-3 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/fare.2001.50.issue-4 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00484.x · DOI
  16. 10.1111/pere.2008.15.issue-1 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.004 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/15332691.2016.1238796 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/0743558407306348 · DOI
  20. Cassidy J., 1999, Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications
  21. 10.1007/s10508-008-9314-4 · DOI
  22. 10.1363/4305111 · DOI
  23. Dedmon J., 2002, Is the Internet bad for your marriage? Online affairs, pornographic sites playing greater role in divorces
  24. DeLamater J., 2004, The handbook of sexuality in close relationships
  25. 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s10834-014-9391-6 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/jasp.2010.40.issue-10 · DOI
  28. Haavio-Mannila E., 2003, Sexual trends in the Baltic Sea area
  29. 10.1207/s15327965pli0501_1 · DOI
  30. 10.3149/jms.1501.57 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/pere.1999.6.issue-4 · DOI
  32. 10.1037/a0029488 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/00224499.2014.976781 · DOI
  34. 10.1521/jscp.2012.31.4.410 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/cad.2014.2014.issue-144 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s10508-009-9585-4 · DOI
  37. 10.1080/10720160600870711 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/00224499.2010.543960 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s10591-016-9396-4 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s10508-012-9986-7 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1177/0093650210362464 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/00224499.2011.648027 · DOI
  44. 10.1080/00224499.2015.1096886 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/10720160008400206 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1080/146819903100153946 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Shaver P. R., 2007, In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation
  48. 10.1080/026143699374925 · DOI
  49. 10.1023/B:QUAS.0000005053.99846.e5 · DOI
  50. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.899 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00124-1 · DOI
  52. 10.1007/s11199-012-0164-0 · DOI
  53. 10.1007/s10508-014-0391-2 · DOI
  54. 10.1080/00224490409552227 · DOI
  55. 10.1037/a0035774 · DOI
  56. 10.1080/14681994.2016.1193134 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/s10896-009-9242-7 · DOI
  58. 10.1007/s10508-009-9592-5 · DOI
  59. 10.1080/00224499.2015.1013601 · DOI
  60. 10.1007/s10508-015-0562-9 · DOI
  61. 10.1080/13691058.2014.927075 · DOI
  62. 10.1007/s10508-011-9766-9 · DOI
  63. 10.1080/10720162.2016.1140604 · DOI
  64. 10.1080/00224499.2011.628132 · DOI
  65. 10.1111/hcre.2017.43.issue-3 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.09.002 · DOI
  67. 10.1080/10720160500362652 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Maas, M. K., Vasilenko, S. A., & Willoughby, B. J.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Brigham Young University (US)
Corresponding author
Maas, Megan K.
Venue
The Journal of Sex Research
Published
2018-03-26
Volume
55
Issue
6
Pages
772-782
ISSN
  • 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-8519
OpenAlex
W2789544823
Cited by
83
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
8.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Sex Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (F31 DA039603; P50 DA039838; T32 DA017629))
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
pornography use, relationship satisfaction, heterosexual couples, attachment anxiety, actor-partner interdependence, dyadic analysis, symbolic interactionism, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Erotica, Female, Humans, Male, Object Attachment, Personal Satisfaction, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Spouses, Heterosexuality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review