The DOI matches its Crossref record.
“By the semi‐mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations
Abstract
Little is known about how women and men communicate sexual consent. In this study, 378 undergraduate women and men completed a questionnaire designed to examine how they would interpret their date's and their own consent signals in hypothetical scenarios and how they actually communicate consent in heterosexual situations. Although there were no gender differences in ratings of the hypothetical date's behavior, men rated their own behaviors in hypothetical scenarios as more representative of consent than women rated their own behaviors, suggesting that women and men may mean different things when they use the same signals. There were some gender differences in how they conveyed consent in actual situations; furthermore, both women and men reported most often showing their consent to sexual intercourse by making no response. The effect sizes of the gender differences were small. The results suggest that gender‐based miscommunications about consent are possible but unlikely. Thus, miscommunication is an unlikely explanation for rape.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224490709336794 · Cited by 272
Self-citationEmerging issues in the measurement of rape victimization
Cook, S. L., Gidycz, C. A., Koss, M. P., & Murphy, M. (2011) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801210397741 · Cited by 214
Adams-Curtis, L. E., & Forbes, G. B. (2004) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838003262331 · Cited by 215
Yes: Affirmative Consent as a Theoretical Framework for Understanding and Imagining Social Platforms
Im, J., Dimond, J., Berton, M., Lee, U., Mustelier, K., Ackerman, M. S., & Gilbert, E. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445778 · Cited by 119
Ågmo, A., & Laan, E. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104595 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Hickman, S. E., & Muehlenhard, C. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 258-272
- ISSN
- 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8519
- OpenAlex
- W1970948147
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “By the semi‐mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00224499909551996
- The paper
- Hickman, S. E., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1999). “By the semi‐mystical appearance of a condom”: How young women and men communicate sexual consent in heterosexual situations. The Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.