Attributions of victim responsibility, pleasure, and trauma in male rape
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the following: (a) the relationship between the sexual orientation of a male rape victim and participants’ attributions of the victim's degree of responsibility, pleasure, and trauma associated with the assault, and (b) differences between male and female participants in their attributions of these variables. Participants were 396 college students. Participants read a brief report describing a male‐on‐male sexual assault. The victim's sexual orientation was described as either heterosexual or homosexual. After reading the report, participants completed a questionnaire assessing their attributions regarding the victim's responsibility for the assault, and the amount of pleasure and trauma the victim experienced from the assault. Participants attributed more responsibility, more pleasure, and less trauma to a homosexual victim than to a heterosexual victim. Male participants attributed more responsibility and pleasure to a male rape victim than did female participants.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As females are suggested to be better at emphasizing with female rape victims, Sleath (2011) suggests that this may explain why female officers could reject rape myths compared to male officers.
“As females are suggested to be better at emphasizing with female rape victims (Mitchell, Hirschman, & Nagayama Hall, 1999), Sleath (2011) suggests that this may explain why female officers could reject rape myths compared to male officers.”
From From 'real rape' to real justice: A systematic review of police officers' rape myth beliefs (2017) · cites this paper as Mitchell, Hirschman, & Nagayama Hall, 1999
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Peterson, Z. D., Voller, E. K., Polusny, M. A., & Murdoch, M. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.08.006 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
From 'real rape' to real justice: A systematic review of police officers' rape myth beliefs
Parratt, K. A., & Pina, A. (2017) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.03.005 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Hine, B. A., Murphy, A. D., Yesberg, J. A., Wunsch, D., Charleton, B., & Widanaralalage Don, B. K. S. (2021) · Police Practice and Research · doi:10.1080/15614263.2020.1843458 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mitchell, D., Hirschman, R., & Nagayama Hall, G. C.
- Affiliations
- Kent State University (US)
- a Kent State University
- ORCID
- Mitchell, Damon
- Venue
- The Journal of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-11-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 369-373
- ISSN
- 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8519
- OpenAlex
- W2031182926
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Sex Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- male rape, victim responsibility, sexual orientation, sexual assault, sexual trauma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review