CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Archaeology in the Service of the Tribe: Three Episodes in Twenty-first-Century Tribal Archaeology in the US–Mexico Borderlands

Darling, J. Andrew, Lewis, Barnaby V., Valencia, Robert, Eiselt, B. Sunday·2015·KIVA
DOI 10.1080/00231940.2015.1118738
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The 1987 publication “Uses of the Past: Archaeology in the Service of the State” offers the inspiration for considering the emerging role of descendent communities in archaeological research and cultural resource management in the American Southwest. Recognizing that interpretations of the past are seldom “value neutral”, we explore the implications and benefits of interpretations of the past when they are “value tribal”. Three episodes in twenty-first-century Tribal Archaeology in Arizona are considered including repatriation of religious objects under state statutes, international repatriation of human remains, and Tribal documentation of traditional cultural properties. We conclude that as federally recognized tribes initiate their own programs in archaeological investigation and assume greater responsibility in the cultural resource management process, new perspectives on the past are coming to light that are of potential benefit to everyone.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00231940.2015.1118738

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • State-directed heritage laws such as NAGPRA and the Karanga Aotearoa Repatriation Programme in New Zealand have been used by Indigenous communities to secure a seat at the proverbial table in matters of archaeological research and cultural heritage management.

    “State-directed heritage laws such as the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) and the Karanga Aotearoa Repatriation Programme in New Zealand have been used by Indigenous communities to secure a seat at the proverbial table in matters of archaeological research and cultural heritage management (e.g.Darling et al. 2015; see also Smith & Wobst 2004 on the parallel”

    From The future of archaeology is (still) community collaboration (2023) · cites this paper as Darling et al. 2015

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Anyon Roger, 2000, Cultural Resource Management in Contemporary Society. Perspectives on Managing and Presenting the Past, 120
  2. Bahr D. M., 1974, Piman Shamanism and Staying Sickness (Ká:cim Múmkidag), 10.2307/j.ctv1q8tfwb · DOI
  3. Basso Keith, 1996, Wisdom Sits in Places: Landscape and Language Among the Western Apache
  4. 10.1017/CBO9781107051409.015 · DOI
  5. 10.7183/2326-3768.3.3.178 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cajete Gregory, 2000, Native Science. Natural Laws of Interdependence
  7. Chenault Mark L., 2002, Ceremony and Symbolism at Los Guanacos: Excavations at the SRP Kyrene Generating Station, 391
  8. Chenault Mark L., 2006, Religion in the Prehispanic Southwest, 145
  9. Cushing F. H., 1890, Congrés International des Américanistes, Compte-rendu de la septième session, 151
  10. 10.1017/S1466046614000490 · DOI
  11. Feld Steven, 1996, Senses of Place
  12. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.63 · DOI
  13. 10.7183/2326-3768.3.3.249 · DOI
  14. Foster Michael S., 1994, The Pueblo Grande Project, Volume 4: Material Culture. Vol, 20
  15. 10.2307/3181491 · DOI
  16. 10.2307/281778 · DOI
  17. Hardesty Donald L., 2000, Assessing Site Significance. A Guide for Archaeologists and Historians
  18. Harrington John P., 1916, 29th Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology for the Years 1907–1908
  19. Haury E. W., 1945, Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology. Vol. XXIV, No. 1. Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Cambridge
  20. Haury E. W., 1976, The Hohokam: Desert Farmers and Craftsmen–Excavations at Snaketown, 1964–1965, 10.2307/j.ctv1mgmcjv · DOI
  21. Hill Erica, 2000, Kiva, 65, 361, 10.1080/00231940.2000.11758417 · DOI
  22. Hill Jane, 2003, Nature Knowledge: Ethnoscience, Cognition and Utility, 161
  23. 10.1525/aa.1904.6.1.02a00050 · DOI
  24. Hu-DeHart Evelyn, 1984, Yaqui Resistance and Survival. The Struggle for Land and Autonomy, 1821–1910
  25. King Thomas F., 2003, Places That Count. Traditional Cultural Properties in Cultural Resource Management
  26. Knight John, 2000, Natural Enemies, People-Wildlife Conflicts in Anthropological Perspective
  27. Lewis Barnaby V., 2009, Archaeology Southwest, 23, 3
  28. Manning Aubrey, 1994, Animals and Human Society, Changing Perspectives
  29. Martin Debra L., 2013, Bioarchaeology. An Integrated Approach to Working with Human Remains, 10.1007/978-1-4614-6378-8 · DOI
  30. McGuire Randall, 1994, Reckoning with the Dead. The Larsen Bay Repatriation and the Smithsonian Institution, 180
  31. 10.1086/204205 · DOI
  32. Mitchell D. R., 1994, The Pueblo Grande Project, Volume 2: Feature Descriptions, Chronology, and Site Structure
  33. Padilla Ramos Raquel, 1995, Yucatan: Fin del Sueño Yaqui. El Trafico de los Yaquis y el Otro Triunvirato. Gobierno del Estado de Sonora y la Secretaría de Educación y Cultura
  34. Parker Patricia L., 1998, Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Traditional Cultural Properties
  35. Philo Chris, 2000, Animal Spaces, Beastly Places, New Geographies of Human–Animal Relations
  36. Pierce L. J., 1987, The Archaeology of the San Xavier Bridge Site (AZ BB:13:14) Tucson Basin, Southern Arizona, Part 3, 443
  37. Ravesloot J. C., 1987, The Archaeology of the San Xavier Bridge Site (AZ BB:13:14) Tucson Basin, Southern Arizona, Part 3
  38. Rea Amadeo M., 1998, Folk Mammalogy of the Northern Pimas
  39. Rea Amadeo M., 2007, Wings in the Desert: A Folk Ornithology of the Northern Pimans
  40. Serpell J., 1986, In the Company of Animals. A Study of Human–Animal Relationships
  41. Taibo II Paco Ignacio, 2013, Yaquis. Historia de una guerra popular y un genocidio en México
  42. Teague L. S., 2001, Arizona Archaeological Council Newsletter, 25, 1
  43. Toensing Gale Courey, 2009, Indian Country Today, 29, 1
  44. Troncoso Francisco P., 1905, Las Guerras con las Tribus Yaqui y Mayo del Estado de Sonora
  45. Turner John Kenneth, 1969, Barbarous Mexico
  46. Urton Gary, 1985, Animal Myths and Metaphors in South America
  47. Winters Harry J., 2012, O'odham Place Names. Meanings, Origins, and Histories, Arizona and Sonora

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Darling, J. A., Lewis, B. V., Valencia, R., & Eiselt, B. S.
Venue
KIVA
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2015-11-05
Volume
81
Issue
1-2
Pages
62-79
ISSN
  • 0023-1940
  • 2051-6177
DOI
10.1080/00231940.2015.1118738
Cited by
4
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review