The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 26 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Reframing and Expanding Sonoran Archaeology
Abstract
Archaeologists acknowledge that contemporary nation state boundaries were irrelevant to precolonial populations. Notwithstanding, the boundary between the United States and México both physically and ideologically impacts language, where archaeologists are trained, how knowledge is disseminated, and what research questions are asked. Sonora's archaeology is generally classified within the Southwest/Northwest culture area; however, English publications are rare when compared to literature from north of the international border. This has created misconceptions that Sonora is an unexplored landscape and undermines decades of diverse binational collaborations and internal research conducted by Centro INAH Sonora. It also stifles our understanding of cultural connectivity across the Southwest/Northwest. The articles within this special issue showcase diverse topics in Sonoran archaeology. They range from identifying Archaic and Early Agricultural occupations to exploring contemporary community-based archaeologies. In all cases, authors reframe Sonora within larger academic discourses and to expand our current knowledge of the region's diverse culture histories.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This editorial introduces a KIVA special issue on Sonoran archaeology, arguing that the U.S.–México border has shaped training, language, funding, and research questions in ways that obscure Sonora's archaeological record. It frames the issue's articles as reframing Sonora within broader Southwest/Northwest and Mesoamerican discourses.
Key findings
- Sonora is the second largest state in México but has been an "archaeologically neglected space"; it holds 11% of México's territory yet receives less than 1% of INAH's total annual budget (citing Martínez-Tagüeña et al. 2022:286).
- There are only 15–20 archaeologists working in Sonora, compared to ∼1,500 presently employed in Arizona.
- The issue's contributing articles report, among other things: an XRF provenance study of nearly 300 obsidian fragments from Trincheras tradition sites, most from a previously unknown source; aggregation of over 13,000 bichrome Trincheras sherds and over 30 vessels producing the first seriation of Trincheras bichrome pottery; and evidence from Las Chachalacas of occupation from the Terminal Pleistocene through the Early Agricultural Period.
- Campos-Hernández's plant-use research is said to debunk prior narratives (e.g., Haury 1976) that Trinchereños were largely nomadic, showing they were committed agriculturalists.
Methods
- Editorial/introduction to a special issue; no primary data collection. It synthesizes the history of archaeological research in Sonora and summarizes each contributed article.
- Historical narrative covers late nineteenth/early twentieth century U.S. investigations, Kirchhoff's (1943) Mesoamerican boundary, Noguera's (1958) survey, and the founding of Centro INAH Sonora in the early 1970s.
- Article summaries describe the contributors' methods, including XRF obsidian sourcing, ceramic seriation, stratigraphic analysis and radiocarbon dating, stable isotope analysis of collagen and bioapatite, aerial photogrammetry, and community-based archaeology.
Limitations
- The editors state that too many articles were proposed for a single issue; topics on the protohistoric period and Indigenous collaboration could not be realized in time, and articles had to be shorter than KIVA's standard 9,000-word limit.
- The text makes evident that this is an editorial overview rather than a research article, so its claims about individual contributions are summaries rather than primary results.
- The editors note that archaeological research in Sonora remains far less developed than in the U.S. Southwest, with fewer researchers, fewer documented sites, and findings often lost among Arizona- and New Mexico-centric literature.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 26 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 5
Archaeological research in Sonora starkly contrasts to its neighboring Arizona.
“Although having a similar landmass, archaeological research in Sonora starkly contrasts to its neighboring Arizona.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Reframing and Expanding Sonoran Archaeology · p. 2
Sonora's archaeology is generally classified within the Southwest/Northwest culture area.
“Sonora ' s archaeology is generally classified within the Southwest/Northwest culture area; however, English publications are rare when compared to literature from north of the international border.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McGuire 1997
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 3
The apparent 'southwestness' of Sonora's archaeology prompted Ralph Beals (1944) to classify the state (and other regions of northern México) as part of the 'Greater Southwest.'
“The apparent ' southwestness ' of Sonora ' s archaeology prompted Ralph Beals (1944) to classify the state (and other regions of northern México) as part of the ' Greater Southwest. '”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beals 1944
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ keywords Sonora, Southwest/Northwest, binational collaboration · p. 3
Archaeological evidence demonstrates that prehispanic populations regularly traversed the modern international border.
“Archaeological evidence demonstrates that prehispanic populations regularly traversed the modern international border (Claypatch 2022; Hayden 1972; McGuire 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Claypatch 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Hayden 1972 source
- cites McGuire 1997
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Reframing and Expanding Sonoran Archaeology · p. 2
The scarcity of English publications on Sonora has created misconceptions that Sonora is an unexplored landscape.
“This has created misconceptions that Sonora is an unexplored landscape and undermines decades of diverse binational collaborations and internal research conducted by Centro INAH Sonora.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: English publications on Sonora are rare compared to literature from north of the international border.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Reframing and Expanding Sonoran Archaeology · p. 2
The scarcity of English publications on Sonora undermines decades of diverse binational collaborations and internal research conducted by Centro INAH Sonora.
“This has created misconceptions that Sonora is an unexplored landscape and undermines decades of diverse binational collaborations and internal research conducted by Centro INAH Sonora.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: English publications on Sonora are rare compared to literature from north of the international border.
- Premisecitation§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 4
Through increased research, perception of Sonora shifted from the U.S.-centric focus of it being the southern periphery of the Southwest to being a northern manifestation of Mesoamerica (La Gran Chichemeca).
“Through increased research, perception of Sonora shifted from the U.S.-centric focus of it being the southern periphery of the Southwest to being a northern manifestation of Mesoamerica ( La Gran Chichemeca ) (Braniff 1985; Di Peso 1968).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Braniff 1985
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Di Peso 1968
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 5
In comparison to ∼1,500 archaeologists presently employed in Arizona, there are only 15-20 working in Sonora.
“In comparison to ∼ 1,500 archaeologists presently employed in Arizona, there are only 15 -20 working in Sonora.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Martínez-Tagüeña et al. 2022:286 source
- Premisecitation§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 5
Despite possessing 11% of México's territory, Sonora receives less than 1% of INAH's total annual budget.
“Furthermore, despite possessing 11% of México ' s territory, it receives less than 1% of INAH ' s total annual budget (Martínez-Tagüeña et al. 2022:286).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Martínez-Tagüeña et al. 2022:286 source
- Premisecitation§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 3
Late nineteenth and early twentieth century U.S. archaeologists were the first to systematically investigate Sonora's archaeology.
“Late nineteenth and early twentieth century U.S. archaeologists were the first to systematically investigate Sonora ' s archaeology (Ekholm 1939; Gladwin and Gladwin 1929; McGee 1898; Sauer and Brand 1931).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ekholm 1939
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gladwin and Gladwin 1929
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites McGee 1898
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ keywords Sonora, Southwest/Northwest, binational collaboration · p. 3
The international border's presence has created real linguistic, ideological, financial, and theoretical boundaries that few U.S. or Mexican archaeologists fluidly traverse.
“Even though archaeologists know that the international border was irrelevant to Indigenous histories, its presence has created real linguistic, ideological, financial, and theoretical boundaries that few U.S. or Mexican archaeologists fluidly traverse (McBrinn and Webster 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McBrinn and Webster 2008 source
- Probably not a substantial claim. 21
- It may state two separate claims as one. 20
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone given§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 4Usage of Southwest/Northwest has become preferred by Sonoran archaeologists and is repeatedly used by U.S. and Mexican scholars within this special issue.
“Usage of Southwest/Northwest has become preferred by Sonoran archaeologists and is repeatedly used by U.S. and Mexican scholars within this special issue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingreasoning§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 4Most articles published within this special issue are products of binational partnership, and all articles transcend boundaries by drawing from literature published by U.S. and Mexican academics.
“Most articles published within this special issue are products of this binational partnership, and all articles transcend boundaries by drawing from literature published by U.S. and Mexican academics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingnone given§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 5While Sonoran archaeologists are required to develop a nuanced understanding of archaeological traditions across Arizona and New Mexico and in west and central México, the same is not expected in reverse.
“Furthermore, while Sonoran archaeologists are required to develop a nuanced understanding of archaeological traditions across Arizona and New Mexico and in west and central México, the same is not expected in reverse.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Findingnone given§ Scope of this Issue · p. 8This special issue marks the first time when articles specifically on Sonora have been aggregated within a major peer-reviewed journal.
“This special issue marks the first time when articles specifically on Sonora have been aggregated within a major peer-reviewed journal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingreasoning§ keywords Sonora, Southwest/Northwest, binational collaboration · p. 3Researchers working binationally in Sonora are improving communication and have built a transnational approach to the region.
“As this special issue demonstrates, researchers working binationally in Sonora are improving communication and have built a transnational approach to the region.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 4In the 1950s, Eduardo Noguera conducted a far-ranging archaeological survey of Sonora for INAH and published the first archaeological summary for the state.
“In the 1950s, Eduardo Noguera conducted a farranging archaeological survey of Sonora for INAH. He then published the first archaeological summary for the state (Noguera 1958).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Noguera 1958
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ Reframing and Expanding Sonoran Archaeology · p. 2The scarcity of English publications on Sonora stifles understanding of cultural connectivity across the Southwest/Northwest.
“It also stifles our understanding of cultural connectivity across the Southwest/ Northwest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: English publications on Sonora are rare compared to literature from north of the international border.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationreasoning§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 4The foundation of the INAH Centro Regional del Noroeste (later Centro INAH Sonora) in Hermosillo dramatically impacted subsequent research in the state.
“In the early 1970s, the INAH Centro Regional del Noroeste was established (later Centro INAH Sonora) in Hermosillo. Its foundation dramatically impacted subsequent research in the state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone given§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 3These researchers published exclusively in English, transported artifacts back to the United States, and reinforced a colonialist model whereby U.S. academics became the gatekeepers for México's past.
“These researchers published exclusively in English, transported artifacts back to the United States, and reinforced a colonialist model whereby U.S. academics became the gatekeepers for México ' s past.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ekholm 1939
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gladwin and Gladwin 1929
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites McGee 1898
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone given§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 3These scholars viewed Sonora from the north looking south and interpreted its archaeology based on its apparent similarities with the better understood populations in the Southwest United States.
“These scholars viewed Sonora from the north looking south and interpreted its archaeology based on its apparent similarities with the better understood populations in the Southwest United States.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationreasoning§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 4The term 'Southwest/Northwest' gives equal acknowledgement to cultural similarities which extended across national boundaries and acknowledges the intersection of two distinctive archaeological schools.
“This term gives equal acknowledgement to cultural similarities which extended across national boundaries and acknowledges the intersection of two distinctive archaeological schools.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone given§ keywords Sonora, Southwest/Northwest, binational collaboration · p. 3These challenges have become increasingly exacerbated with the rise of cultural resource management (U.S.) and salvamento (México) projects in Arizona and Sonora.
“These challenges have become increasing exacerbated with the rise of cultural resource management (U.S.) and salvamento (México) projects in Arizona and Sonora.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ keywords Sonora, Southwest/Northwest, binational collaboration · p. 3Nineteenth century nationalist and colonialist endeavors in the United States and México shaped prehispanic culture areas and impacted their research trajectory.
“In both the United States and México, nineteenth century nationalist and colonialist endeavors shaped prehispanic culture areas and impacted their research trajectory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McGuire 2008 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationreasoning§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 5Fewer researchers mean fewer sites are documented and important findings are often lost within the numerous Arizona and New Mexico-centric articles.
“Fewer researchers mean fewer sites are documented and important findings are often lost within the numerous Arizona and New Mexico-centric articles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 4Recent publications, including Hinterlands to Cities, have become essential and accessible readings for those interested in Sonoran and Chihuahuan archaeology.
“Furthermore, recent publications, including Hinterlands to Cities: The Archaeology of Northwest Mexico and its Vecinos , have become essential and accessible readings for those interested in Sonoran and Chihuahuan archaeology (Pailes and Searcy 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pailes and Searcy 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationreasoning§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 4This model, looking from the south to north, has made Sonoran archaeologists keenly aware of the prehispanic cultures from throughout central and west México, a region that few Southwestern U.S. archaeologists know about.
“This model, looking from the south to north, has made Sonoran archaeologists keenly aware of the prehispanic cultures from throughout central and west México, a region that few Southwestern U.S. archaeologists know about.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationreasoning§ keywords Sonora, Southwest/Northwest, binational collaboration · p. 3Sonora fell into an archaeologically neglected space that has profoundly impacted its study.
“Despite being the second largest state in México, Sonora fell into an archaeologically neglected space that has profoundly impacted its study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone given§ keywords Sonora, Southwest/Northwest, binational collaboration · p. 3Literature is seldom widely publicized and archaeologists working in opposing borders are rarely cognizant of important new discoveries.
“In both cases, literature is seldom widely publicized and archaeologists working in opposing borders are rarely cognizant of important new discoveries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationreasoning§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 4For the first time, Mexican archaeologists could assert control over the interpretation and preservation of Sonora's prehispanic past.
“For the first time, Mexican archaeologists could assert control over the interpretation and preservation of Sonora ' s prehispanic past.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ keywords Sonora, Southwest/Northwest, binational collaboration · p. 3The Indigenous O'odham still retain ancestral lands and maintain important ceremonial pilgrimages in both Arizona and Sonora.
“Despite centuries of colonialism and oppression, the Indigenous O ' odham still retain ancestral lands and maintain important ceremonial pilgrimages in both Arizona and Sonora (Darling and Lewis 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Darling and Lewis 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ keywords Sonora, Southwest/Northwest, binational collaboration · p. 3Following the revolution in México, archaeology became a means for legitimizing the state and for connecting the rebuilt nation with the grandeurs of ancient Mesoamerica.
“Following the revolution in México, archaeology became a means for legitimizing the state and for connecting the rebuilt nation with the grandeurs of ancient Mesoamerica (McGuire 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McGuire 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 4Kirchhoff (1943) defined a dynamic fluctuating northern border but one that did not cross into Sonora.
“In his classic definition of the Mesoamerican culture area, Kirchhoff (1943) defined a dynamic fluctuating northern border but one that did not cross into Sonora.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kirchhoff 1943
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Premisecitation§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 4McGuire (1997) has used 'Southwest/Northwest' to encompass the Southwest U.S. and the Mexican states of Chihuahua and Sonora.
“McGuire (1997) has used ' Southwest/Northwest ' to encompass the Southwest U.S. and the Mexican states of Chihuahua and Sonora.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McGuire 1997
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Interpretationreasoning§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 4These binational collaborations have created an academic landscape which is unique to the U.S.-México borderlands.
“These binational collaborations have also created an academic landscape which is unique to the U.S.-México borderlands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Premisenone given§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 4Few Mexican scholars entered from the south looking north.
“Just as few U.S. researchers entered Sonora from the north, few Mexican scholars entered from the south looking north.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationreasoning§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 3The term 'Greater Southwest' acknowledged the presence of a prehispanic culture area which extended beyond the international border, but maintained the lingering taste of Sonora as an afterthought.
“While this term acknowledged the presence of a prehispanic culture area which extended beyond the international border, it maintained the lingering taste of Sonora as an afterthought.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Premisenone given§ keywords Sonora, Southwest/Northwest, binational collaboration · p. 3Sonora was geographically distant from INAH in Mexico City and its material culture lacked the spectacle or intrigue of archaeological sites in central and southern México.
“Sonora was geographically distant from INAH (Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia) in Mexico City and its material culture lacked the spectacle or intrigue of archaeological sites in central and southern México.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Premisecitation§ Sonora ' s Culture History · p. 4These binational projects often publish results in English and Spanish and conferences, such as Southwest Symposium, have steadily increased the accessibility of research within Sonora and elsewhere in northern México.
“These binational projects often publish results in English and Spanish and conferences, such as Southwest Symposium (held three times in northern México), have steadily increased the accessibility of research within Sonora and elsewhere in northern México (McBrinn and Webster 2008; Pailes and Searcy 2022; Villalpando 2002; Villalpando and McGuire 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites McBrinn and Webster 2008 source
- cites Pailes and Searcy 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Villalpando 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationnone given§ Reframing and Expanding Sonoran Archaeology · p. 2The boundary between the United States and México physically and ideologically impacts language, where archaeologists are trained, how knowledge is disseminated, and what research questions are asked.
“Notwithstanding, the boundary between the United States and México both physically and ideologically impacts language, where archaeologists are trained, how knowledge is disseminated, and what research questions are asked.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
English publications on Sonora are rare compared to literature from north of the international border.
“however, English publications are rare when compared to literature from north of the international border.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Since the 1980s, most of Sonora's largest and best-funded research projects have been made possible through binational collaborations and funding derived primarily from U.S. grants.
“Since the 1980s, most of Sonora ' s largest and best-funded research projects have been made possible through binational collaborations and funding derived primarily from U.S. grants.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most U.S. archaeologists are often unaware of recent archaeological research within Sonora and their knowledge is often limited to major sites.
“Most U.S. archaeologists are often unaware of recent archaeological research within Sonora and their knowledge is often limited to major sites, including La Playa and Cerro de Trincheras.”
Citations
Cites
Haury, E. W. (1976) · University of Arizona Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1mgmcjv · Cited by 269
Archaeology as Political Action
McGuire, R. H. (2008) · doi:10.1525/9780520941588 · Cited by 268
Self-citationWebster, L. D., & McBrinn, M. E. (2008) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 70
Hohokam Petroglyphs of the Sierra Pinacate, Sonora and the Hohokam Shell Expeditions
Hayden, J. D. (1972) · KIVA · doi:10.1080/00231940.1972.11757754 · Cited by 28
Carpenter, J., Sánchez, G., Tapia-Carrasco, R., Krug, A. R., Cupa, E., Larrick, D., Hernández, C. E., Singleton, R. R., & Pailes, M. (2023) · Journal of Field Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00934690.2023.2258715 · Cited by 5
Arqueología Incluyente: Weaving Diverse Narratives in Northwestern Mexican Archaeology
Martínez-Tagüeña, N., Sánchez, G., Carpenter, J., Torres Cubillas, L. A., & Vélez, L. (2022) · Advances in Archaeological Practice · doi:10.1017/aap.2022.19 · Cited by 1
1 Creating an Archaeology without Borders
McBrinn, M. E., & Webster, L. D. (2008) · Archaeology without Borders · doi:10.5876/9780870819742.c002
(1943)
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Beals, Ralph L. 1944 Relations between Mesoamerica and The Southwest. In El Norte de México y el Sur de Estados Unidos, pp. 245–252. Sociedad Mexicana de Antropología, Mexico City.
- Braniff Beatriz 1985 La Frontera Protohistorica Pima-Opata en Sonora México. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation Facultad de Filosofia y Letras. UNAM México.
- Claypatch Hunter M. 2022 Beyond the Purple Paint: Seriating Trincheras Pottery and Identifying Cultural Connectivity in Northern Sonora Mexico. PhD dissertation Department of Anthropology Binghamton University Binghamton NY.
- Darling, J. Andrew, and Barnaby V. Lewis 2007 Songscapes and Calendar Sticks. In The Hohokam Millennium, edited by Suzanne K. Fish and Paul R. Fish, pp. 131–140. School for Advanced Research, Santa Fe.
- Di Peso, Charles C. 1968 Casas Grandes and the Gran Chichimeca. Museum of New Mexico Press, Santa Fe.
- Ekholm, Gordon F. 1939 Results of an Archaeological Survey of Sonora and Northern Sinaloa. Revista Mexicana de Antropología 3(1):7–11.
- McGee, WJ 1898 The Seri Indians. Bureau of American Ethnology, Seventeenth Annual Report, Part I, pp. 1–344. Government Printing Office, Washington.
- McGuire, Randall H. 1997 Crossing the Border. In Prehistory of the Borderlands, edited by John Carpenter and Guadalupe Sanchez, pp. 130–137. Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series 186. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
- McGuire, Randall H., and C Elisa Villalpando 2007 The Hohokam and Mesoamerica. In The Hohokam Millennium, edited by Suzanne K. Fish and Paul R. Fish, pp. 57–64. Arizona State Museum Archaeological Series 186. School for Advanced Research, Santa Fe.
- Pailes, Matthew C., and Michael T. Searcy 2022 Hinterlands to Cities: The Archaeology of Northwest Mexico and its Vecinos. Society For American Archaeology, Washington, DC.
- Sauer, Carl, and Donald Brand 1931 Prehistoric Settlements of Sonora with Special Reference to Cerro de Trincheras. University of California Publications in Geography 5:67–148.
- Villalpando, M. Elisa (editor) 2002 Boundaries and Territories: Prehistory of the U.S. Southwest and Northern Mexico. Arizona State University, Tempe.
- Villalpando, Elisa, and Randall H. McGuire (editors) 2014 Building Transnational Archaeologies / Construyendo Arqueologías Transnacionales: The 11th Southwest Symposium / El XI Simposio del Suroeste, Hermosillo, Sonora, México. Arizona State Museum, Tucson.
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Claypatch, H. M., Canchola, E. V., & McGuire, R. H.
- Affiliations
- Binghamton University (US)
- Centro INAH Sonora
- Corresponding author
- Claypatch, Hunter M.
- Venue
- KIVA
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2024-07-02
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 285-292
- ISSN
- 0023-1940 (ISSN-L)
- 2051-6177
- OpenAlex
- W4401145333
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- KIVA (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Archaeology and Natural History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
- Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Keywords
- U.S.-Mexico border, cultural connectedness, community archaeology, research dissemination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
