The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A survey of reproductive biology in Onagraceae
Open accessAbstract
Onagraceae constitute a clearly marked family of the order Myrtales, comprising 7 tribes, 17 genera, and about 674 species. Of these species, about 42% are outcrossed, 52% self‐pollinated, and another 6% contain both sorts of breeding systems within a single species. In outcrossed species, the stigma is always elevated above the anthers at anthesis. The three principal modes of enforcing outcrossing are protandry, in Epilobium , Clarkia , and Lopezia (with protogyny in most species of Circaea ); male sterility, independently derived in four small sections of Fuchsia ; and genetic self‐incompatibility, found in at least 76 species, representing 4 of the 7 tribes and 10 of the 17 genera of the family. Nearly all of the trees and shrubs in the family, but only about one third of the annuals and perennial herbs, are outcrossing. Clarkia is an example of an entirely annual genus that consists predominantly of outcrossing species, whereas Ludwigia and Epilobium are predominantly perennial genera that consist of a majority of self‐pollinating species (and, in contrast to Clarkia, are largely polyploid). Less than one fifth of the trees, shrubs, and annuals in Onagraceae, but about 60% of the perennials, are polyploid. Aneuploid changes in chromosome number and the evolution of complex heterozygotes, the latter represented by 52 species of 4 different genera of the tribe Onagreae, take place largely among annual species in this family. Data summarised for the pollination systems of the approximately 283 modally outcrossing species of Onagraceae indicate that 37% of the species, representing 12 genera, are bee‐pollinated; 31% bird‐pollinated; 17% hawkmoth‐pollinated; 7% pollinated by syrphid and tachinid flies; 6% noctuid‐pollinated; and 0.4% (1 species: Clarkia concinna ) by a combination of cyrtid flies and butterflies. No species is known to be modally pollinated by bats, by beetles, or by wind, and none has apomixis involving seeds, nor heterostyly. Some 22 individual shifts in pollination system would be sufficient to account for the evolution of the roughly 283 outcrossing species of the family, but an additional number of shifts probably involving at least 300 events would be necessary to account for the evolution of the 353 modally autogamous species. The repeated evolution of autogamy is clearly the most important evolutionary process involved in the multiplication of species of Onagraceae.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genetics and morphological evolution in plants
Gottlieb, L. D. (1984) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284231 · Cited by 361
The collection of pollen by bees
Thorp, R. W. (2000) · Plant Systematics and Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf00984103 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Raven, P. H.
- Venue
- New Zealand Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 575-593
- ISSN
- 0028-825X (ISSN-L)
- 1175-8643
- OpenAlex
- W2022268142
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey of reproductive biology in Onagraceae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0028825x.1979.10432572
- The paper
- Raven, P. H. (1979). A survey of reproductive biology in Onagraceae. New Zealand Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825x.1979.10432572
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.