Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Material culture after text: re‐membering things

Olsen, BjØrnar·2003·Norwegian Archaeological Review

Abstract

Why have the social and human sciences shown such disinterest in material culture? How has this neglect affected archaeology? How do things and materiality at large relate to human beings and ‘social life’? These questions are addressed in this article which also critically examines social constructivist and phenomenological approaches to material culture. Arguing against the maxim that ‘all that is solid melts into air’, it is claimed that to understand important aspects of past and present societies, we have to relearn to ascribe action, goals and power to many more ‘agents’ than the human actor — in other words, to re‐member things.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00293650310000650

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Archaeology and forensic anthropology are key disciplines for generating historical knowledge in a context with little documentary evidence and where impressions have relied primarily on oral sources.

    “archaeology and forensic anthropology enter the scientific field as two key disciplines for generating historical knowledge in a context where there is little documentary evidence and where impressions have hitherto relied primarily on oral sources.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Ashmore W. Knapp A. B. Archaeological landscapes: constructed, conceptualised, ideational. In Ashmore, W. & Knapp, A.B. (eds.),Archaeologies of Landscape: Contemporary Perspectives. Blackwell Oxford
  2. Attfield J. 2000Wild Things. The Material Culture of Everyday Life. Berg Oxford–New York · DOI
  3. Barret J. 1994Fragments from Antiquity. Blackwell Oxford
  4. Bender B. 1993 Introduction. In Bender, B. (ed.),Landscape: Politics and Perspectives. Berg Oxford
  5. Bender B. 2002 Landscape and politics. In Buchli, V. (ed.), 2002.The Material Culture Reader. Berg Oxford
  6. Bradley R. 1998The Significance of Monuments. Routledge London
  7. Brown B. 2003A Sense of Things. The Object Matter of American Literature. The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London · DOI
  8. Buchli V. (ed.) 2002The Material Culture Reader. Berg Oxford/New York
  9. Dant T. 1999Material Culture in the Social World. Values, Activities, Lifestyles. Open University Press Buckingham, Philadelphia
  10. Deetz J. 1977In Small Things Forgotten. The Archaeology of Early American Life. Anchor Books New York · DOI
  11. Durkheim E. 1951, (1897)The Suicide. A Study in Sociology. The Free Press New York
  12. Feldt S. Basso K. (eds) 1996Senses of Place. School of American Research Press Santa Fe
  13. Glassie H. 1999Material Culture. Indiana University Press Bloomington and Indianapolis
  14. Gosden C. 1994Social Being and Time. Blackwell Oxford
  15. Grosz E. 2002Architecture From the Outside. Essays on Virtual and Real Space. The MIT Press Cambridge, MA
  16. Hacking I. 2001The Social Construction of What? Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA and London
  17. Heidegger M. 1982Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Indiana University Press Bloomington
  18. Hodder I. 1986Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press Cambridge
  19. 10.4324/9780203466025 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Law J. Hassard J. (eds.) 1999Actor Network Theory and After. Blackwell Oxford
  21. Law J. 1999 After ANT: complexity, naming and topology. In Law, J. & Hassard, J. (eds.),Actor Network Theory and After. Blackwell Oxford · DOI
  22. Law J. Mol A. (eds.) 2002Complexities. Social Studies of Knowledge Practices. Duke University Press Durham, NC
  23. Latour B. 1987Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press London/Cambridge, MA
  24. Latour B. 1993We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press London/Cambridge, MA
  25. Latour B. 1999Pandora's Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Harvard University Press London/Cambridge, MA
  26. Latour B. 2002 Bodies, cyborgs and the politics of incarnation. In Sweeney, S. & Hodder, I. (eds.),The Body. Cambridge Cambridge University Press
  27. Leach E. 1973 Concluding address. In Renfrew, C. (ed.),The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory. University of Pittsburg Press Pittsburg
  28. Macann C. 1993Four Phenomenological Philosophers: Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau‐Ponty. Routledge London
  29. Matthews E. 2002The Philosophy of Merleau‐Ponty. McGill‐Queen's University Press Montreal · DOI
  30. Merleau‐Ponty M. 1962The Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul London
  31. Merleau‐Ponty 2000 (1968)The Visible and the Invisible. Northwestern University Press Evanston
  32. Miller D. 1987Material Culture and Mass Consumption. Blackwell Oxford
  33. 10.4324/9780203167014 · DOI
  34. Miller D. 1998bA Theory of Shopping. Polity Cambridge
  35. Miller D. 2002 Consumption. In Buchli, V. (ed.),The Material Culture Reader. Berg Oxford/New York
  36. Mullarkey J. 2000Bergson and Philosophy. University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana
  37. Olsen B. 1990 Roland Barthes: from sign to text. In Tilley, C. (ed.),Reading Material Culture. Blackwell Oxford
  38. Pearson K. A. 2002Philosophy and the Adventure of the Virtual. Bergson and the Time of Life. Routledge London/New York
  39. Pearson M. Shanks M. 2002Theatre/Archaeology. Routledge London
  40. Ricoeur P. 1970Freud and Philosophy: an Essay on Interpretation. New Haven Yale University Press
  41. Serres M. 1995Genesis. The University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor · DOI
  42. Serres M. Latour B. 1995Conversation on Science, Culture and Time. The University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor · DOI
  43. Schiffer M. B. 1999The Material Life of Human Beings. Artifacts, Behavior, and Communication. Routledge London/New York
  44. Shanks M. 1995Classical Archaeology: Experiences of the Discipline. Routledge London
  45. Simmel G. 1978, (1907)The Philosophy of Money. Routledge & Kegan Paul London
  46. Soja E. W. 2000Postmetropolis. Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Blackwells Oxford
  47. Thomas J. 1996Time, Culture and Indentity. An Interpretive Archaeology. Routledge London
  48. Thomas J. 1998 Some problems with the notion of external symbolic storage, and the case of Neolithic material culture in Britain. In Renfrew, C. & Scarre, C. (eds.),Cognition and Material Culture. The Archaeology of Symbolic Storage. Macdonald Institute Monographs Cambridge
  49. Thomas J. 2000 Reconfiguring the social, reconfiguring the material. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.),Social Theory in Archaeology. The University of Utah Press Salt Lake City
  50. Tilley C. (ed.) 1990Reading Material Culture, Blackwell Oxford
  51. Tilley C. 1991Material Culture and Text: The Art of Ambiguity. Routledge London
  52. Williams S. J. Bendelow G. 1998The Lived Body: Sociological Themes, Embodied Issues. Routledge London · DOI
  53. Østerberg D. 1985 Materiell och praxis. In Andersson, S., Johansen, T. Nilson, G. & Østerberg, D. (eds.),Mellan människor och ting. Korpen Gøteborg

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Olsen, B.
Venue
Norwegian Archaeological Review
Published
2003-10
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
87-104
ISSN
  • 0029-3652
  • 1502-7678
Cited by
279
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review