Semen analysis: its place in modern reproductive medical practice
Abstract
Semen analysis is the most important laboratory investigation for men when assessing the infertile couple. Advances in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) techniques, particularly intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) involving the direct injection of a single spermatozoon into an egg, have not diminished the role of semen analysis in modern reproductive practice. Semen analysis is the most basic laboratory investigation undertaken and is descriptive in terms of semen volume, appearance, viscosity, sperm concentration, sperm motility and morphology. Since the results are used by clinicians to choose appropriate treatment options, a reliable service is imperative. It is crucial that the laboratory is experienced in the performance of semen analyses to ensure an accurate result. To ensure a quality semen analysis service, laboratories must participate in internal and external quality assurance activities, incorporate rigorous training protocols for technical staff and use reliable procedures. The World Health Organization laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm cervical mucous interaction, clearly describes the variables that need to be assessed and the methods of analysis and quality assurance to be used.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Standard semen parameters are poorly predictive for producing a pregnancy in vivo.
“Semen analysis is widely used as a surrogate measure of a man's reproductive capacity, but in truth, standard semen parameters are poorly predictive for producing a pregnancy in vivo (McLachlan et al., 2003;Li et al., 2006;Nallella et al., 2006).”
From Isolated abnormal strict morphology is not a contraindication for intrauterine insemination (2015) · cites this paper as McLachlan et al., 2003
Cites
The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria
Menkveld, R., Stander, F. S. H., Kotze, T. J. V., Kruger, T. F., & Zyl, J. A. V. (1990) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137150 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
Slama, R. (2002) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/17.2.503 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Isolated abnormal strict morphology is not a contraindication for intrauterine insemination
Lockwood, G. M., Deveneau, N. E., Shridharani, A. N., Strawn, E. Y., & Sandlow, J. I. (2015) · Andrology · doi:10.1111/andr.12098 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- McLachlan, R. I., Gordon Baker, H. W., Clarke, G. N., Harrison, K. L., Matson, P. L., Holden, C. A., & De Kretser, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Monash IVF (AU)
- Royal Women's Hospital (AU)
- Venue
- Pathology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-33
- ISSN
- 0031-3025 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092104058
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
- Keywords
- semen analysis, male infertility, semen quality, sperm motility, sperm morphology, sperm concentration, semen volume, in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, quality assurance, laboratory accreditation
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Infertility, Male, Laboratories, Male, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Quality Control, Semen, Specimen Handling, Spermatozoa, World Health Organization, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review