Cited by 35Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesMale Reproductive Health Studies

Semen analysis: its place in modern reproductive medical practice

McLachlan, Robert I., Gordon Baker, H.W., Clarke, Gary N., Harrison, Keith L., Matson, Phillip L., Holden, Carol A., De Kretser, David M.·2003·Pathology

Abstract

Semen analysis is the most important laboratory investigation for men when assessing the infertile couple. Advances in in vitro fertilisation (IVF) techniques, particularly intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) involving the direct injection of a single spermatozoon into an egg, have not diminished the role of semen analysis in modern reproductive practice. Semen analysis is the most basic laboratory investigation undertaken and is descriptive in terms of semen volume, appearance, viscosity, sperm concentration, sperm motility and morphology. Since the results are used by clinicians to choose appropriate treatment options, a reliable service is imperative. It is crucial that the laboratory is experienced in the performance of semen analyses to ensure an accurate result. To ensure a quality semen analysis service, laboratories must participate in internal and external quality assurance activities, incorporate rigorous training protocols for technical staff and use reliable procedures. The World Health Organization laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm cervical mucous interaction, clearly describes the variables that need to be assessed and the methods of analysis and quality assurance to be used.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0031302021000062280

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Standard semen parameters are poorly predictive for producing a pregnancy in vivo.

    “Semen analysis is widely used as a surrogate measure of a man's reproductive capacity, but in truth, standard semen parameters are poorly predictive for producing a pregnancy in vivo (McLachlan et al., 2003;Li et al., 2006;Nallella et al., 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLachlan, R. I., Gordon Baker, H. W., Clarke, G. N., Harrison, K. L., Matson, P. L., Holden, C. A., & De Kretser, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Monash IVF (AU)
  • Royal Women's Hospital (AU)
Venue
Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
25-33
ISSN
0031-3025 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092104058
Cited by
35
References
2
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
Keywords
semen analysis, male infertility, semen quality, sperm motility, sperm morphology, sperm concentration, semen volume, in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, quality assurance, laboratory accreditation
MeSH terms
Humans, Infertility, Male, Laboratories, Male, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Quality Control, Semen, Specimen Handling, Spermatozoa, World Health Organization, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review