Cited by 308Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesMale Reproductive Health Studies

Time to pregnancy and semen parameters: a cross-sectional study among fertile couples from four European cities

Slama, R.·2002·Human Reproduction

Abstract

Background In fertile populations, little is known about the association between semen parameters and time to pregnancy (TTP). Methods Pregnant women from Copenhagen, Edinburgh, Paris and Turku who conceived without medical intervention were asked for their TTP (942 couples), and their partners provided a semen sample. The proportion of morphologically normal sperm and the multiple anomalies index (MAI, ratio of the total number of anomalies to the number of abnormal sperm) were centrally estimated. We estimated rate ratios for the occurrence of a pregnancy by a discrete survival model, adjusted for sexual activity and female factors affecting fecundity. Results Increasing sperm concentration influenced TTP up to 55 x 10(6)/ml. The proportion of morphologically normal sperm influenced TTP up to 39% according to David's criteria, and this association held among the subjects with a sperm concentration >55 x 10(6)/ml. For strict criteria, the threshold value was 19% normal sperm. An increase of 0.5 in MAI was associated with an adjusted rate ratio for the occurrence of a pregnancy of 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.54-0.85). Conclusions These results highlight the importance of sperm morphology parameters and indicate that the effect of proportion of normal sperm on TTP may be independent of sperm concentration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/17.2.503

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slama, R.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Slama, R.
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2002-02-01
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
503-515
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2135968453
Cited by
308
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
Keywords
time to pregnancy, semen parameters, sperm concentration, sperm morphology, spontaneous conception, fertility, fecundability
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Europe, Female, Fertility, Fertilization, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Probability, Semen, Sperm Count, Spermatozoa, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review