“If You Don’t Cheat, You Lose”: An Explorative Study of Business Students’ Perceptions of Cheating Behavior
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Business students are more likely to exhibit unethical behavior compared to students in other disciplines.
“Research suggests that business students are more likely to exhibit unethical behavior compared to students in other disciplines (Grenness, 2023;Harvey et al., 2020;McCabe et al., 2006;Parks-Leduc et al., 2022).”
From Ethical use of artificial intelligence based tools in higher education: Are future business leaders ready? (2025) · cites this paper as Grenness, 2023
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449 · see citing works
Denzin, N. (1989) · doi:10.4135/9781412984584 · Cited by 1,947 · see citing works
McCabe, D. (2017) · doi:10.1353/book.18818 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mumtaz, S., Carmichael, J., Weiss, M., & Nimon-Peters, A. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13099-8 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
- Authors
- Grenness, T.
- Affiliations
- BI Norwegian Business School (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Grenness, Tor
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-09-16
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1122-1136
- ISSN
- 0031-3831 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1170
- OpenAlex
- W4296078699
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
- Keywords
- academic dishonesty, cheating, business students, student perceptions, academic integrity, student attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
