Cited by 128Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

The Cash Opportunity Costs of Childbearing: An Approach To Estimation Using British Data

Joshi, Heather·1990·Population Studies

Abstract

The opportunity costs of rearing British children in terms of cash earnings foregone by their mother are estimated for a typical family. Data from the Women and Employment Survey (1980) provide estimates for hourly pay as a function of work experience and current hours of work. They also make possible the generation of participation and hours profiles for representative women with different numbers of children, which, together with the earnings function are used to simulate lifetime income. Earnings foregone as a result of bearing and rearing two children are roughly equally composed of three effects, on participation, hours and pay. They exceed direct costs, and do not rise proportionally with family size. They are sensitive to the spacing of births but not, undiscounted, to the timing of the first one. The method and results contrast markedly with those of a similarly motivated study of US women, by Calhoun and Espenshade. It is argued that the non-linearity of the earnings function and state dependence in British labour force transitions would violate the assumptions which permitted the US exercise to be based on a multi-state labour force life-table.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0032472031000144376

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Motherhood obligations lead to limitations in career opportunities and losses in work earnings, referred to as the opportunity costs of motherhood.

    “However, an opposing force ostensibly influences women: motherhood obligations lead to limitations in career opportunities and losses in work earnings, referred to as the opportunity costs of motherhood (Joshi 1990).”

    From Education, Gender, and Cohort Fertility in the Nordic Countries (2019) · cites this paper as Joshi 1990

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joshi, H.
Affiliations
Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Joshi, Heather
Venue
Population Studies
Published
1990-03
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
41-60
ISSN
  • 0032-4728 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4747
OpenAlex
W2030205967
Cited by
128
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Population Studies (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
parenting, women's labour force participation, birth spacing, family size, lifetime income, earnings functions, state dependence, labor force transitions, British women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review