The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples
Abstract
We present a theoretical framework that organizes individual-level fertility motivations into a couple-level model. One feature of this framework is the Traits-Desires-Intentions-Behaviour (TDIB) sequence through which the fertility motivations of individuals produce instrumental behaviours that are designed to promote or prevent childbearing. A second feature of this framework is the cognitive capacity of individuals to perceive a partner's motivational structure. We combine these two features into a dyad-level model that addresses interactions between partners at each step of the motivational sequence. We elaborate this model first with respect to the perception of partner's motivational structure and second with respect to the combination of partner's and own motivational structure. In the process we consider how couple-level processes of communication, influence, and disagreement can be measured and studied through these interactions. We conclude with a summary discussion of the framework and a consideration of the implications it has for a theory of reproductive psychology, population surveys, and family planning services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blanc, A. K. (2001) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2001.00189.x · Cited by 610
Cited by
Huinink, J., Brüderl, J., Nauck, B., Walper, S., Castiglioni, L., & Feldhaus, M. (2011) · Journal of Family Research · doi:10.20377/jfr-235 · Cited by 548
Shattuck, D., Kerner, B., Gilles, K., Hartmann, M., Ng'ombe, T., & Guest, G. (2011) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2010.300091 · Cited by 335
Measuring progressions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression
Wilson, M. (2009) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20318 · Cited by 329
Childbearing desires of childless men and women: When are goals adjusted?
Gray, E., Evans, A., & Reimondos, A. (2013) · Advances in Life Course Research · doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2012.09.003 · Cited by 110
Do Family Support Environments Influence Fertility? Evidence from 20 European Countries
Harknett, K., Billari, F. C., & Medalia, C. (2014) · European Journal of Population · doi:10.1007/s10680-013-9308-3 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, W., Severy, L., & Pasta, D.
- Venue
- Population Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-205
- ISSN
- 0032-4728 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4747
- OpenAlex
- W1973013322
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0032472042000213712
- The paper
- Miller, W., Severy, L., & Pasta, D. (2004). A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples. Population Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472042000213712
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.