The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (pairfam): Conceptual framework and design
Open accessAbstract
This article introduces the DFG-funded “Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics” (pairfam) study, which was initiated to provide an extended empirical basis for advances in family research. Within the context of challenges in couples and family research, we address the major substantive fields covered by the pairfam panel: couple dynamics and partnership stability, childbearing, parenting and child development, and intergenerational relationships. Then we present the conceptual framework and survey design of pairfam. The panel started with about 4,000 respondents (anchors) in each of three birth cohorts: 1991-1993, 1981-1983, and 1971-1973. The panel also includes anchors’ partners. From the second wave onwards parents and children of anchors are included. The policy of pairfam with regard to the provision of scientific use files and data distribution are discussed in the concluding remarks. Zusammenfassung Dieser Beitrag stellt das deutsche Beziehungs- und Familienpanel (pairfam) vor, das eine empirische Basis für Fortschritte in der Beziehungsund Familienforschung bieten soll. Vor dem Hintergrund zentraler Herausforderungen in der Partnerschafts- und Familienforschung werden Themenschwerpunkte, der konzeptuelle Rahmen und das Design des pairfam-Projekts vorgestellt. Inhaltlich fokussiert werden Fragen der Aufnahme, Gestaltung und Beendigung von Partnerschaftsbeziehungen, Elternschaftsentscheidungen bei Familiengründung und -erweiterung, Erziehung und Eltern-Kind-Beziehungen sowie Intergenerationenbeziehungen. Befragungsteilnehmer waren in der ersten Erhebungswelle je rund 4.000 Jugendliche (geboren 1991-93), junge Erwachsene (geboren 1981-83) und Erwachsene im mittleren Lebensalter (geboren 1971-73) sowie nach Möglichkeit auch deren Partner/in. Ab der zweiten Erhebungswelle werden auch Eltern und Kinder einbezogen. Am Ende des Beitrages werden einige Angaben zur Distribution der Daten als scientific use file gemacht.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
A Handbook of Child Psychology
(1932) · Nature · doi:10.1038/130331a0 · Cited by 10,101
Socialization In The Context Of The Family: Parent-Child Interaction
Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983) · Cited by 5,215
Time, Human Agency, and Social Change: Perspectives on the Life Course
Jr., G. H. E. (1994) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2786971 · Cited by 2,852
The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research.
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3 · Cited by 2,608
Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131151 · Cited by 2,091
Bengtson, V. L. (2001) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00001.x · Cited by 1,635
The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias: A Meta-Analysis
Groves, R. M., & Peytcheva, E. (2008) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfn011 · Cited by 1,434
Socialization, personality, and social development
Hetherington, E. M. (1983) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 1,385
The Relationship Between Parenting and Delinquency: A Meta-analysis
Hoeve, M., Dubas, J. S., Eichelsheim, V. I., van der Laan, P. H., Smeenk, W., & Gerris, J. R. M. (2009) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9310-8 · Cited by 1,358
Cited by
Re-thinking residential mobility: Linking lives through time and space
Coulter, R., Ham, M. V., & Findlay, A. M. (2016) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132515575417 · Cited by 455
Virtanen, M., Jokela, M., Madsen, I. E., Magnusson Hanson, L. L., Lallukka, T., Nyberg, S. T., Alfredsson, L., Batty, G. D., Bjorner, J. B., Borritz, M., et al. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.3712 · Cited by 219
Mund, M., Maes, M., Drewke, P. M., Gutzeit, A., Jaki, I., & Qualter, P. (2023) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911221077227 · Cited by 192
Schemer, C., Masur, P. K., Geiß, S., Müller, P., & Schäfer, S. (2021) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmaa014 · Cited by 166
Transitions in romantic relationships and development of self-esteem.
Luciano, E. C., & Orth, U. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000109 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Huinink, J., Brüderl, J., Nauck, B., Walper, S., Castiglioni, L., & Feldhaus, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Family Research
- Publisher
- Universitatsbibliothek Bamberg
- Published
- 2011-04-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-101
- ISSN
- 1437-2940 (ISSN-L)
- 2699-2337
- OpenAlex
- W1565517723
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 83
- FWCI
- 71.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (pairfam): Conceptual framework and design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.20377/jfr-235
- The paper
- Huinink, J., Brüderl, J., Nauck, B., Walper, S., Castiglioni, L., & Feldhaus, M. (2011). Panel Analysis of Intimate Relationships and Family Dynamics (pairfam): Conceptual framework and design. Journal of Family Research. https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-235
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.