Cited by 51Demographic Trends and Gender PreferencesGlobal Maternal and Child HealthReproductive Health and Contraception

Son preference, use of maternal health care, and infant mortality in rural China, 1989–2000

Chen, Jiajian, Xie, Zhenming, Liu, Hongyan·2007·Population Studies

Abstract

This study assesses the effects of socio-economic conditions and the interaction between son preference and China's one-child family planning policy on the use of maternal health care services and their effects on infant mortality in rural China, using nationally representative data from the 2001 National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Survey. The results show that while the use of maternal health care services has continued to increase over time, large gaps still exist in the use of these services and in infant survival by mother's education, community income, and parity. Further improvements in the reproductive health of all women and in infant survival will require effective reduction of the obstacles to the use of maternal health care among those women in rural China who are less educated, poor, and of higher parity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00324720701340194

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Botched operations and lack of proper postoperative care resulted in some women having lifelong disabilities.

    “Botched operations and lack of proper postoperative care resulted in some women having lifelong disabilities (Doherty et al. 2001, Chen et al. 2007).”

    From The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy (2021) · cites this paper as Chen et al. 2007

  • The one-child policy acted as a significant hindrance for pregnant women to receive prenatal care, affecting both maternal and infant health.

    “The policy further acted as a significant hindrance for pregnant women to receive prenatal care, affecting both maternal and infant health.”

    From The Social and Sociological Consequences of China's One-Child Policy (2021) · cites this paper as Chen et al. 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, J., Xie, Z., & Liu, H.
Affiliations
  • East–West Center (US)
  • China Population and Development Research Center (CN)
Venue
Population Studies
Published
2007-07
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
161-183
ISSN
  • 0032-4728 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4747
OpenAlex
W1992294633
Cited by
51
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Population Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
son preference, maternal health service utilization, infant mortality, one-child policy, family planning, rural China, maternal education, household income, parity, reproductive health, gender preference
MeSH terms
Adult, China, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Male, Maternal Health Services, Parity, Pregnancy, Rural Population, Sex Ratio, Socioeconomic Factors, Family Planning Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review