Cited by 110Demographic Trends and Gender PreferencesChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceReproductive Health and Contraception

Are births underreported in rural China? Manipulation of statistical records in response to China’s population policies

Open access
Merli, M. Giovanna, Raftery, Adrian E.·2000·Demography

Abstract

Under the current family planning policy in China, the criterion for evaluating all parties involved in the birth planning system provides an incentive for everyone to see that the policy is met, either in reality through strict enforcement of family planning regulations, or statistically through manipulation of statistical records. We investigate underreporting of births in four rural counties of northern China, using data from a 1992 sample survey featuring a reproductive history. To clarify the mechanisms of underreporting, we focus on the ways in which reporting errors may affect the distribution of first births by time since marriage. The results of our investigation suggest that in three of the four counties, first-birth intervals are lengthened by underreporting of girl babies and by replacing them with second births reported as first births.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2648100

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study carried out in rural Sichuan province in 1990 reported a doubling of maternal deaths for unapproved pregnancies as compared with those receiving government sanction.

    “A study carried out in rural Sichuan province in 1990 reported a doubling of maternal deaths for unapproved pregnancies as compared with those receiving government sanction. 11”

    From The Effect of China's One-Child Family Policy after 25 Years (2005) · cites this paper as [11]

    The paper’s study description (p. 109) places its survey in northern China in 1992 and describes an analysis of underreported births. The Data section discusses infant deaths, not maternal deaths. Searches for Sichuan, maternal mortality, and a comparison of approved with unapproved pregnancies found no passage reporting the claimed doubling. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Aird, J.S. 1986. "Coercion in Family Planning: Causes, Methods, and Consequences." Pp. 184-221 in China's Economy Looks Toward the Year 2000: The Four Modernizations, Vol. 1, edited by the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  2. Friedman, E., P.G. Pickowicz, and M. Selden. 1991. Chinese Vil- lage, Socialist State. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  3. Gray, R. 1979. "Biological Factors Other Than Nutrition and Lac- tation Which May Influence Natural Fertility: A Review." Pp. 219-51 in Patterns and Determinants of Natural Fertility, ed- ited by H. Leridon and J. Menken. Liège: Ordina Editions.
  4. Greenhalgh, S. and J. Li. 1995. "Engendering Reproductive Prac- tice in Peasant China: For a Feminist Demography of Repro- duction." Signs 20(3):601-41.
  5. Johansson, S., Z. Xuan, and O. Nygren. 1991. "On Intriguing Sex Ratios Among Live Births in China in the 1980s." Journal of Official Statistics 7(1):25-41.
  6. Rindfuss, R.R. and S.P. Morgan. 1983. "Marriage, Sex, and the Quiet Revolution in Asia." Population and Development Review 2:259-78.
  7. Smith, H.L. and L. Tian. 1993. "Variation in Sex Ratios for First Births in Four Counties: Where Does the Variation Begin?" Pre- sented at the Conference on Introducing New Contraceptives in Rural China, Honolulu.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merli, M. G., & Raftery, A. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Demography
Published
2000-02-01
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
109-126
ISSN
  • 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-7790
OpenAlex
W2018447293
Cited by
110
References
55
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Demography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Rockefeller Foundation
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • University of Washington
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
statistical manipulation, family planning policy, one-child policy, rural China, first birth interval, sex-selective abortion, reproductive history
MeSH terms
China, Data Collection, Family Planning Services, Female, Forms and Records Control, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Male, Population Control, Public Policy, Regression Analysis, Rural Population, Sex Ratio, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review