The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling the Potential Dispersal of Asian Longhorned Beetle Using Circuit Theory
Abstract
The Asian longhorned beetle (ALB, Anoplophora glabripennis) is an invasive pest species currently infesting major port cities in North America and Europe. There is limited knowledge regarding the pathways of movement across heterogeneous landscapes at local scales. This study models dispersal pathways using circuit theory in Worcester, Massachusetts, which has the largest ongoing ALB infestation in North America. Circuit theory–based dispersal modeling provides a means of predicting the movement of random walkers across a landscape comprising differential resistance to movement. Calibration of landscape resistance to ALB movement used a combined expert opinion and empirical approach, with 820 ALB presence points for calibration and validation. Results indicate that ALB typically uses nonhabitat land-cover types to connect suitable habitat patches. Circuit modeling was a better predictor of spatial patterns of dispersal than least-cost dispersal modeling, especially by predicting narrow corridors that connect large habitat patches. ALB dispersal modeling is difficult due to limited data availability and ongoing ALB habitat modification. This article contributes to knowledge of ALB dispersal patterns at local and regional scales, using empirically driven methods to provide spatially explicit predictions of high dispersal probability and habitat suitability for ALB, using the best data sets available. Key Words: Asian longhorned beetle, circuit theory, invasive species, urban fo…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most modelers featured in our dynamic examples (Table 1) have included several resistance grids, while a few of the most dynamic assessments have taken on large numbers of runs, including use of 40 resistance grids to explore land use and climate change scenarios [84], and 72 time-steps to evaluate the spread of an invasive beetle [62].”
From Circuitscape in julia: empowering dynamic approaches to connectivity assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [62]
Citations
Cites
USING CIRCUIT THEORY TO MODEL CONNECTIVITY IN ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND CONSERVATION
McRae, B. H., Dickson, B. G., Keitt, T. H., & Shah, V. B. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-1861.1 · Cited by 2,244
Codling, E. A., Plank, M. J., & Benhamou, S. (2008) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0014 · Cited by 1,482 · cited 2×
“The aggregate dispersal pattern produced by this analysis is therefore best described as biased random walk (sensu Codling, Plank, and Benhamou 2008).”
BackgroundMethodMcRae, B. H. (2006) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00500.x · Cited by 1,081
Research works printed but not linked: 61
- 10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00089-X · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00132860 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.005 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2005.00320.x · DOI
- 10.1890/08-1898.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01716.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01550.x · DOI
- 10.1674/0003-0031(2003)150[0001:AOSPAS · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1026062530600 · DOI
- Danko J. J. V., 2016, The Northeastern Geographer, 8, 1
- 10.1139/x11-097 · DOI
- Doyle P. G., 2000, American Mathematical Monthly, 94, 202
- 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.04.011 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0088293 · DOI
- 10.1111/afe.12096 · DOI
- 10.1111/eea.12292 · DOI
- 10.1139/x05-249 · DOI
- Haack R. A., 2006, Great Lakes Entomologist, 39, 169
- 10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085427 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01480.x · DOI · Paper page
- Herwitz E, 2001, Trees at risk: Reclaiming an urban forest. A case history of Worcester, Massachusetts
- 10.1080/2150704X.2013.852704 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2009.00443.x · DOI
- Huebner C. D, 2003, Castanea, 68, 1
- Junbao W., 1998, Acta Ecologica Sinica, 18, 269
- 10.1007/s10530-017-1398-0 · DOI
- 10.1603/0046-225X-35.4.912 · DOI
- 10.2307/2845770 · DOI
- Liebhold A. M., 1995, Forest Science Monograph, 30, 49
- 10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091401 · DOI
- 10.1078/1618-8667-00025 · DOI
- 10.1093/jipm/pmv003 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10530-008-9420-1 · DOI
- 10.1603/EN14049 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.05.028 · DOI
- 10.1603/0022-0493-94.1.116 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.01.009 · DOI
- 10.1093/condor/103.3.599 · DOI
- 10.1086/378926 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Poland T. M, 1998, Newsletter of the Michigan Entomological Society, 43, 15
- Raupp M. J., 2006, Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 32, 297, 10.48044/jauf.2006.038 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01907.x · DOI
- Santos R., 2012, Massachusetts Asian longhorned beetle cooperative eradication program determines next steps for eradication efforts in Worcester County
- 10.1080/10106049.2015.1086901 · DOI
- Singleton, P. H., and W. L. Gaines. 2002.Landscape permeability for large carnivores in Washington: A geographic information system weighted-distance and least-cost corridor assessment.Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest. · DOI
- 10.1093/biomet/38.1-2.196 · DOI
- 10.1603/0046-225X-30.6.1036 · DOI
- 10.1603/0046-225X-33.2.435 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10021-003-0092-5 · DOI
- 10.1111/afe.12160 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01600.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s10530-015-0961-9 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00854.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.11.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1603/0046-225X-33.3.540 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:UECO.0000004828.05143.67 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10980-012-9737-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhou J., 1984, Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 20, 372
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Circuitscape in julia: empowering dynamic approaches to connectivity assessment
Hall, K. R., Anantharaman, R., Landau, V. A., Clark, M., Dickson, B. G., Jones, A., Platt, J., Edelman, A., & Shah, V. B. (2021) · Land · doi:10.3390/land10030301 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Elmes, A., Rogan, J., Williams, C., Ratick, S., & Nowak, D.
- Affiliations
- Clark University
- USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station
- ORCID
- Elmes, Arthur
- Venue
- The Professional Geographer
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-07-12
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 580-594
- ISSN
- 0033-0124
- 1467-9272
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review