The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945
Abstract
Mark Franklin Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. £16.99, pbk; ISBN 0521541476; £45 hbk; ISBN 0521833647
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research
Geys, B. (2006) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2005.09.002 · Cited by 860
The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout
Smets, K., & van Ham, C. (2013) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.12.006 · Cited by 799
(2014) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137275844 · Cited by 300
Electoral institutions and popular confidence in electoral processes: A cross-national analysis
Birch, S. (2008) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.005 · Cited by 280
The Legacy of Lethargy: How Elections to the European Parliament Depress Turnout
Franklin, M. N., & Hobolt, S. B. (2011) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.019 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Fieldhouse, E.
- Venue
- Representation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 304-307
- ISSN
- 0034-4893 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-4001
- OpenAlex
- W2107367455
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 49.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00344890508523327
- The paper
- Fieldhouse, E. (2005). Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. Representation. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890508523327
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
